From: Ton H. <a.j...@ch...> - 2005-03-01 22:48:20
|
Hi, Just to let you all know: I am busy hacking a driver / editor for the TC Electronic G-Major. It's almost finished. I will upload the first version within a week or so. Regards, Ton Holsink. |
From: Ton H. <a.j...@ch...> - 2005-03-10 20:05:24
|
There's a tarred version available of the synth driver. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1156735&group_id=41208&atid=430007 Let me know what you think. I'm open to any suggestions. Regards, Ton Holsink |
From: Bill Z. <wrz...@po...> - 2005-03-13 07:45:24
|
CZ-1000 editor is finally done. But I have questions: * The CZ sysex has more bits than the front panel -- i.e. there are waveforms and parameter values accessible in the sysex that aren't available from the physical synth. The editor's normal mode mimics the panel, but "hack mode" opens up the extras. The switch is in source right now; is there a good place to put it in the GUI? Note that the editor window has to be rebuilt when this is toggled. * The CZ doesn't appear to support updating individual params, so I didn't add any senders. This means user must twiddle sliders, then double-click the patch in the library to try it out. Is there a better way to handle this? I don't want to queue up kilobytes of sysex messages. -Bill |
From: Joe E. <jo...@em...> - 2005-03-13 11:51:51
|
Bill Zwicky wrote: > * The CZ doesn't appear to support updating individual params, so I > didn't add any senders. This means user must twiddle sliders, then > double-click the patch in the library to try it out. Is there a > better way to handle this? I don't want to queue up kilobytes of > sysex messages. Can you do a tabbed panel, and put the "front panel" controls on one called, maybe, "Front Panel" and the other stuff in another panel (like "Extras"), or would it be really awkward to break the parameters up like that? - Joe |
From: Bill Z. <wrz...@po...> - 2005-03-13 17:26:25
|
Joe Emenaker wrote: > Can you do a tabbed panel, and put the "front panel" controls on one > called, maybe, "Front Panel" and the other stuff in another panel > (like "Extras"), or would it be really awkward to break the parameters > up like that? They don't divide that way. The controls are all the same, but hack mode opens up wider value ranges. But that's actually a good idea .. it would let the user see how synth values translate to sysex values. So that brings up another question: If I have two sliders editing the same parameter, how do I get one to reflect changes in the other? -Bill |
From: Hiroo H. <hir...@co...> - 2005-03-13 19:27:13
|
Bill> * The CZ sysex has more bits than the front panel -- i.e. there are Bill> waveforms and parameter values accessible in the sysex that aren't Bill> available from the physical synth. The editor's normal mode mimics the Bill> panel, but "hack mode" opens up the extras. The switch is in source Bill> right now; is there a good place to put it in the GUI? Note that the Bill> editor window has to be rebuilt when this is toggled. You can use Pereference. For example my Roland TD-6 drum editor shows only pads which a user enabled on the preference window. I described this in programming.html briefly. --------------------- III.e.3. Keeping Persistent Parameters The second constructor has an argument, java.util.prefs.Preferences object prefs. By using this and overriding config() method, your driver can have persistent parameters for your synth driver. See actual code, for example RolandTD6Device, for more details. ---------------------- Bill> * The CZ doesn't appear to support updating individual params, so I Bill> didn't add any senders. This means user must twiddle sliders, then Bill> double-click the patch in the library to try it out. Is there a better Bill> way to handle this? I don't want to queue up kilobytes of sysex messages. You can add a "Send" (or "Sync"?) button on your editor. It is a little bit better than changing frame and doing double click. -- Hiroo Hayashi |
From: Joe E. <jo...@em...> - 2005-03-01 23:48:37
Attachments:
smime.p7s
|
Ton Holsink wrote: > Just to let you all know: > I am busy hacking a driver / editor for the TC Electronic G-Major. > It's almost finished. I will upload the first version within a week or > so. I think the current plan is to only upload bug-fixes to the CVS tree until the v0.2 version is branched/tagged. - Joe |