Joachim> Hiroo > If we define the following method in Driver class, the change was
Joachim> not
Joachim> Hiroo > necessary and we can keep compatibility of synth drivers.
Joachim>
Joachim> I see no reason to re-animate the old storePatch(Patch ...) method.
Joachim> The change is done, why should it be re-animated?
Joachim>
Joachim> Do I forget something?
There may be (probably 'are', I guess) drivers outside CVS.
Joachim> But what is on major API changes like from Version 0.18
Joachim> to 0.19?
We made the changes with good reasons. On this case I don't see a good
reason to lose compatibility (except the change is done).
I read help pages of Eclipses and knew the refracturing is a great
feature. I'll play with it and revert the change if it is easy for me.
I agree with you it is not worth to much work.
Joachim> Perhaps we should make a list which supported synthesizers
Joachim> each one of us has.
What do you mean by 'us'? The current ML subscriber or reader (I think
the latter is less than the former). I agree. It would be better the
list of tested driver when we release a version.
--
Hiroo Hayashi
|