Are there any plans to change the license to a less viral Apache/MIT license?
Nice work though. If you put this up on Github, people can fork the project so that they can fix bugs faster and together.
the license is LGPL, not GPL. There's nothing viral about it…
Then perhaps you should add the LGPL license.txt inside/with the JAR files. Today, it does not say clearly what license it comes with.
Regards, Ashwin.
It's good to be LGPL, but there is no LGPL license.txt in JAR files.
Log in to post a comment.
Are there any plans to change the license to a less viral Apache/MIT license?
Nice work though. If you put this up on Github, people can fork the project so that they can fix bugs faster and together.
the license is LGPL, not GPL. There's nothing viral about it…
Then perhaps you should add the LGPL license.txt inside/with the JAR files. Today, it does not say clearly what license it comes with.
Regards,
Ashwin.
It's good to be LGPL, but there is no LGPL license.txt in JAR files.