From: Aaron J. <ja...@go...> - 2011-05-25 04:23:46
|
Alright, I've implemented my understanding of the desired behavior in SVN revision 216, documenting the change in NEWS.txt. A few questions: * Could you take a look at NEWS.txt and tell me whether you agree with the behavior? I made changes to the other isFoo methods to make them more consistent and less surprising (for example, I don't know why null returned true for isArray). * It feels like now that these completely describe the safety of the asFoo methods, the isConvertibleTo method is redundant. It's also not completely descriptive, since it doesn't distinguish 64-bit integers. Should I delete it? We don't ever use it at Google, but I suppose this may be a problem for other codebases. Aaron |