Re: [Jsdsi-devel] Re: Why?
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
sajma
|
From: Sameer A. <aj...@cs...> - 2004-03-22 15:56:44
|
Yes. Here's the list of changes that I know of for this build (feel free to elaborate, correct, and extend): JSDSI now uses Maven for builds. Reorganized directory structure as needed by Maven. Added jsdsi.util package (stability: semi-stable, maintainer: Sean Radford). Added jsdsi.ldap package (stability: experimental, maintainer: Luis Pedro). Added jsdsi.xml package (stability: experimental, maintainer: Sameer Ajmani). Does not yet follow any standard XML schema. Added SexpInput and SexpOutput interfaces, and refactored SexpInputStream, SexpOutputStream, XmlReader, and XmlWriter to use these interfaces. Extended S2X utility to support XML input and output. Fixed tag intersection bug for SetTag. Added ReversePrefixTag type. Added toString(int,int,int), toTransport() convenience methods to jsdsi.Obj. Added JUnit tests for S-expression marshalling and LDAP. Sameer > On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 14:12, Sameer Ajmani wrote: >> I still agree that 1-element or 0-element SetTags make no sense. But >> the compatibility issue is worrisome -- perhps we should just >> deprecate that behavior for now, to give luis (and others) the chance >> to fix it. > More than happy to go along with that - I'll volunteer to do the work. > > Are we happy with the rest of the code in CVS (so I can do a build)? > > Sean > >> Sameer >> >> > Luis, >> > >> > (tag (* set foo)) >> > >> > is exactly equivalent in meaning to: >> > >> > (tag foo) >> > >> > It was decided that allowing a SetTag to be empty or contain only >> one element was non-sensical and so should be disallowed - with any >> SetTag that would contain only 1 element (resulting from >> intersection) to be 'converted' to the the element itself. >> > >> > Sorry if it has caused you problems. >> > >> > Do people want to re-visit this issue? >> > >> > Sean >> > >> > On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 12:50, Luis Pedro wrote: >> >> Well, >> >> >> >> I remember, a little, of a discussion about the Tags. This my sound >> stupid, but can any of u (Sean, Sameer) explain me why the SetTag >> needs at least 2 elements. >> >> >> >> I made an actualization of jsdsi on the application(here) and >> because of that change it's all up side down :), i think i'm gonna >> revert the process!! Some people here are beginning to cry >> :))))....they don't know about the backup!! :))) >> >> >> >> -- Luis Pedro >> > -- >> > Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc >> > sra...@ae... >> > http://www.aegeus-technology.com >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------- >> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >> > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO >> of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> > Jsdsi-devel mailing list >> > Jsd...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsdsi-devel >> >> >> http://ajmani.net >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Jsdsi-devel mailing list >> Jsd...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsdsi-devel > -- > Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc > sra...@ae... > http://www.aegeus-technology.com http://ajmani.net |