Thread: Re: [Fwd: [Jsdsi-devel] Re: [Fwd: Branch-algo]]
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
sajma
Menu
▾
▴
jsdsi-devel
|
From: Sean R. <sra...@ae...> - 2004-10-17 22:02:01
|
Sameer Ajmani wrote: >Sean, > >I took a look through the diff between branch and head: >cvs diff -N -u -r HEAD -r branch-algo > >Your changes look good, but there has been a fair bid of code cleanup >sinc eyou branched (so there's a lot in HEAD that ought to be kept). >Also, since 1.5 offers enums as a language feature, it makes sense to >represent algos with 1.5 enums. > >Here's what I suggest: rather than doign a traditional merge of your >branch into the mainline, consider reimplementing your algo stuff >using 1.5 enums in the mainline, just using your branched code as a >guide.. That way, you'll preserve all the recent changes and get a >chance to make the algo stuff as clean as it can be. > >Thanks for the contribution -- it looks good! >Sameer > >On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:38:47 +0100, Sean Radford ><sra...@ae...> wrote: > > >>-- >>Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc >>sra...@ae... >>http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ >> >> >> >>---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>From: Sean Radford <sra...@ae...> >>To: Sameer Ajmani <aj...@gm...>, jsdsi devel <jsd...@li...> >>Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:44:24 +0100 >>Subject: [Jsdsi-devel] Re: [Fwd: Branch-algo] >>Sameer Ajmani wrote: >> >> >> >>>Sameer Ajmani wrote: >>> >>> Can you tell me how to check out that branch? I'll be out of town >>>next week, but I'll check it out when I get the chance. >>> >>>Sameer >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Sorry, but looks like I didn't get round to answering this one... >> >>Take a look at: >> >>https://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs-1.11.17/cvs_5.html#SEC57 >> >>(the branch is called 'branch-algo') >> >>Sean >> >> >> If the consensus is to move to 1.5 then that seems the sensible thing to do. -- Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc sra...@ae... http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ |
|
From: Sameer A. <aj...@gm...> - 2004-10-25 17:48:01
|
It turns out 1.5 classes *cannot* be used by 1.4 JRE. What this means is, if we want JSDSI to be usable by 1.4 clients, we cannot port JSDSI to 1.5 (unless we want to maintain two versions, which I don't think we want). Sorry for my misstatements earlier! Sameer On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:42:40 -0400, Sameer Ajmani <aj...@gm...> wrote: > Sean, > > I took a look through the diff between branch and head: > cvs diff -N -u -r HEAD -r branch-algo > > Your changes look good, but there has been a fair bid of code cleanup > sinc eyou branched (so there's a lot in HEAD that ought to be kept). > Also, since 1.5 offers enums as a language feature, it makes sense to > represent algos with 1.5 enums. > > Here's what I suggest: rather than doign a traditional merge of your > branch into the mainline, consider reimplementing your algo stuff > using 1.5 enums in the mainline, just using your branched code as a > guide.. That way, you'll preserve all the recent changes and get a > chance to make the algo stuff as clean as it can be. > > Thanks for the contribution -- it looks good! > Sameer > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:38:47 +0100, Sean Radford > <sra...@ae...> wrote: > > > > -- > > > > Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc > > sra...@ae... > > http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Sean Radford <sra...@ae...> > > To: Sameer Ajmani <aj...@gm...>, jsdsi devel <jsd...@li...> > > Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:44:24 +0100 > > Subject: [Jsdsi-devel] Re: [Fwd: Branch-algo] > > Sameer Ajmani wrote: > > > > >Sameer Ajmani wrote: > > > > > > Can you tell me how to check out that branch? I'll be out of town > > >next week, but I'll check it out when I get the chance. > > > > > >Sameer > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but looks like I didn't get round to answering this one... > > > > Take a look at: > > > > https://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs-1.11.17/cvs_5.html#SEC57 > > > > (the branch is called 'branch-algo') > > > > Sean > > > > -- > > > > Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc > > sra...@ae... > > http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media > > 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 > > Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. > > http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 > > _______________________________________________ > > Jsdsi-devel mailing list > > Jsd...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsdsi-devel > > > > > > > > > -- > Sameer Ajmani > http://ajmani.net > -- Sameer Ajmani http://ajmani.net |
|
From: Sean R. <sra...@ae...> - 2004-10-25 18:15:15
|
Sameer Ajmani wrote: >It turns out 1.5 classes *cannot* be used by 1.4 JRE. What this means >is, if we want JSDSI to be usable by 1.4 clients, we cannot port JSDSI >to 1.5 (unless we want to maintain two versions, which I don't think >we want). Sorry for my misstatements earlier! > >Sameer > > That's what I would have thought. I would guess that 1.5 language features, such as the new style 'for loop' might though. I'm still in 2 minds. For us moving to 1.5 could be a real problem in some organisations... Also, isn't there so much other functionality that could be done to make JSDSI more useful - and so be a better use of our time at present? Sean -- Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc sra...@ae... http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ |
|
From: Sameer A. <aj...@gm...> - 2004-10-25 18:49:44
|
Yes, there are plenty more features to implement. I just like the 1.5 features :) Hell, I just like beutifying code :) S On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:20:22 +0100, Sean Radford <sra...@ae...> wrote: > Sameer Ajmani wrote: > > >It turns out 1.5 classes *cannot* be used by 1.4 JRE. What this means > >is, if we want JSDSI to be usable by 1.4 clients, we cannot port JSDSI > >to 1.5 (unless we want to maintain two versions, which I don't think > >we want). Sorry for my misstatements earlier! > > > >Sameer > > > > > That's what I would have thought. I would guess that 1.5 language > features, such as the new style 'for loop' might though. I'm still in 2 > minds. For us moving to 1.5 could be a real problem in some organisations... > > Also, isn't there so much other functionality that could be done to make > JSDSI more useful - and so be a better use of our time at present? > > > > Sean > > -- > Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc > sra...@ae... > http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ > > -- Sameer Ajmani http://ajmani.net |
|
From: Michael J. <mij...@in...> - 2004-10-25 20:44:51
|
On Monday 25 October 2004 20:20, Sean Radford wrote: > That's what I would have thought. I would guess that 1.5 language > features, such as the new style 'for loop' might though. I'm still in 2 > minds. For us moving to 1.5 could be a real problem in some > organisations... Has anybody already asked this question on the user-list? I mean, if there is nobody using JSDSI in production there would be no problem, or am I wrong? > Also, isn't there so much other functionality that could be done to make > JSDSI more useful - and so be a better use of our time at present? I agree. Another thing I find very interesting is a port to J2ME we should consider in my opinion. Bye, Michael. |
|
From: Sean R. <sra...@ae...> - 2004-10-26 21:40:56
|
Michael Jaeger wrote: > >I agree. Another thing I find very interesting is a port to J2ME we should >consider in my opinion. > > That sounds interesting. Has anyone here ever looked at J2ME? -- Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc sra...@ae... http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X