Thread: [Jsdsi-devel] JDK 1.5 Decision
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
sajma
From: Sean R. <sra...@ae...> - 2004-11-03 16:06:50
|
Guys, Do we want to make a final decision on JDK 1.5? I think that we should vote ourselves, and if we decide that we would like to move to 1.5 then put it to 'the community' to have the final say... Thoughts? I myself think that we should stick with 1.4 Sean -- Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc sra...@ae... http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ |
From: Michael A. J. <mic...@ac...> - 2004-11-03 16:58:36
|
Hi, I would find it interesting to do the porting, but I don't think that we really need it as I find other things (like J2ME) more important. Mi. On Wednesday 03 November 2004 17:13, Sean Radford wrote: > Guys, > > Do we want to make a final decision on JDK 1.5? > > I think that we should vote ourselves, and if we decide that we would > like to move to 1.5 then put it to 'the community' to have the final > say... Thoughts? > > I myself think that we should stick with 1.4 > > Sean -- + Michael A. Jaeger, Berlin University of Technology + Intelligent Networks and Management of Distributed Systems + http://ivs.tu-berlin.de/mjaeger |
From: Sean R. <sra...@ae...> - 2004-11-03 17:09:40
|
Michael A. Jaeger wrote: >Hi, > >I would find it interesting to do the porting, but I don't think that we >really need it as I find other things (like J2ME) more important. > > > I agree - there are more important things to spend time on currently. And we don't want to upset existing users and limit newer potential ones by stipulating 1.5. -- Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc sra...@ae... http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ |
From: Sameer A. <aj...@gm...> - 2004-11-03 17:51:59
|
I agree we should postpone 1.5 until our known users are using it. I'm not sure why we want to port to J2ME -- can you provide some motivation on this? On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 17:16:23 +0000, Sean Radford <sra...@ae...> wrote: > Michael A. Jaeger wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I would find it interesting to do the porting, but I don't think that we > >really need it as I find other things (like J2ME) more important. > > > > > > > I agree - there are more important things to spend time on currently. > And we don't want to upset existing users and limit newer potential ones > by stipulating 1.5. > > > > -- > Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc > sra...@ae... > http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Jsdsi-devel mailing list > Jsd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsdsi-devel > > -- Sameer Ajmani http://ajmani.net |
From: Michael J. <mij...@in...> - 2004-11-03 21:07:49
|
Well, I worked on a project using SPKI in a MANET environment. From my point of view the decentralized nature of SPKI fits very well into this environment. But maybe I'm the only one thinking this way ;-). Unfortunately, I have not much time these days to work on this topic, but I'm planning to do this in future... Bye, Mi. On Wednesday 03 November 2004 18:51, Sameer Ajmani wrote: > I agree we should postpone 1.5 until our known users are using it. > I'm not sure why we want to port to J2ME -- can you provide some > motivation on this? > > > On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 17:16:23 +0000, Sean Radford > > <sra...@ae...> wrote: > > Michael A. Jaeger wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >I would find it interesting to do the porting, but I don't think that we > > >really need it as I find other things (like J2ME) more important. > > > > I agree - there are more important things to spend time on currently. > > And we don't want to upset existing users and limit newer potential ones > > by stipulating 1.5. > > > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc > > sra...@ae... > > http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Jsdsi-devel mailing list > > Jsd...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsdsi-devel |
From: Sean R. <sra...@ae...> - 2004-11-03 23:23:35
|
Sameer Ajmani wrote: >I agree we should postpone 1.5 until our known users are using it. > > Shall I merge my 'algorythm branch code' into the HEAD then? -- Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc sra...@ae... http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ |
From: Sameer A. <aj...@gm...> - 2004-11-03 23:30:31
|
Yes, this should be fine. On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 23:30:25 +0000, Sean Radford <sra...@ae...> wrote: > Sameer Ajmani wrote: > > >I agree we should postpone 1.5 until our known users are using it. > > > > > Shall I merge my 'algorythm branch code' into the HEAD then? > > -- > > > Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc > sra...@ae... > http://www.aegeus-technology.com/ > > -- Sameer Ajmani http://ajmani.net |