Re: [Jsdoc-user] [JSDoc 2 is now in the Initial Planning Phase -- Have at it!]
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
mmathews
From: Michael M. <mi...@gm...> - 2006-10-18 20:50:39
|
Hi Cameron, Head over to the google group (the JSDoc2 discussion has become split unfortunately, but it belongs in the google group). http://groups.google.com/group/jsdoc-2 There's a thread started already called "What Language?" Thanks for your interest, read what's already been posted and then you can repost this there if you still want to. Regards, Michael On 18/10/06, Cameron Shorter <cam...@gm...> wrote: > > What language are you planning to write jsdoc2 in? > > One of our problems with JSDoc is that it is written in perl, and is > difficult for windows developers to set up, and difficult to integrate > with java build scripts. (For http://communitymapbuilder.org we use ant). > > My criteria for the language is it needs to be easy to install, and > preferably already installed, wherever the JS is being developed > (windows, linux, mac etc). > > Gabriel Reid wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I'm just passing on this announcement from Michael Mathews about a > second > > incarnation of JSDoc that is currently in the planning phase. We're > hoping > > to address the many shortcomings of the current version of JSDoc, but we > > first need to get feedback from everyone who is using the tool. > > > > If you have any JavaScript documenting wants or needs that JSDoc isn't > > currently addressing, now is your chance to let yourself be heard! > > > > The discussion can be found at <http://groups.google.com/group/jsdoc-2>. > > > > Looking forward to hearing from you! > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Gabriel Reid > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message ----- > > > > ANNOUNCEMENT: For quite a long time now Gabriel Reid has been laboring > > valiently to keep up with the evolving needs and requests of the JSDoc > > users, burdened by a general design which simply wasn't flexible enough > > to easily handle the new world of JavaScript we now find ourselves in. > > > > I take full responsibility for getting Gabriel into this situation and > > want to make what ammends I can by helping to design a new, more > > powerful, flexible and extensable version for the future. JSDoc 2.0 > > will be a ground-up rebuild with the paramount intention of handling > > more variations in code and style than was possible in JSDoc 1. > > > > So, while the clay is still wet and gooey, you are highly encouraged to > > stick a finger into the shape of what JSDoc 2 will be. What have you > > always wanted but couldn't have in your JS documentation? Any and all > > suggestions will be considered and, if the case is good, will be > > implemented. > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Jsdoc-user mailing list > > Jsd...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsdoc-user > > > > > -- > Cameron Shorter > http://cameron.shorter.net > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Jsdoc-user mailing list > Jsd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsdoc-user > |