Re: [Jsdoc-user] [JSDoc 2 is now in the Initial Planning Phase -- Haveat it!]

[Michael M. <mi...@gm...>]

http://code.google.com/hosting/

On 18/10/06, Michael Mathews <mi...@gm...> wrote:
>
> <Michael pulls on flame-proof pajamas>
>
> Please note that supporting Prototype, or any framework, is not an
> endorsement of any particular practice those frameworks may or may not
> engage in (especially the well-beaten topic of modifying the
> Object.prototype field.)
>
> As I've said elsewhere, I myself don't use Prototype -- tried it once and
> didn't keep it --  but I have participated in the blog-o-bating about it
> elsewhere. If anyone wants to join that debate THIS IS NOT THE PLACE. Oops,
> my all-caps must have locked on there. Sorry bout that.
>
> But thanks for the  input :-)
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
> On 18/10/06, Peter Michaux <pet...@gm... > wrote:
> >
> > > And yes, your claim is backed up by the recent survey at Ajaxian:
> > >
> > > http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxiancom-2006-survey-results
> >
> > Given all Prototype's shortcomings and bad practices this is
> > unfortunate. JS developers should strive for better.
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
>