Re: [Jsdoc-user] generated HTML missing method details unless class used

[Gabriel R. <gab...@gm...>]

On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:33:02PM -0500, bru...@wa... wrote:
> thanks.
> BTW(1), when trying to test your suggestion, I tried the little file 
> attached
> and JsDoc failed and said...
> Loading sources from observer3.js
> Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at 
> c:\JSDoc-1.9.8\jsdoc.pl line 1096.

This has been fixed in JSDoc 1.9.8.1. Thanks for pointing it out.

> BTW(2), here is an enhancement request....
> Allow filenames in the @requires tag (at least in the comment block with 
> @fileoverview)
> so that one .js file can note its dependence on other .js files.
> While JsDoc will place the referenced file in the HTML in plain text,
> it gives error messages when running JsDoc. Also, it would be nice for
> the filename to actually be a link in the HTML to the referenced .js file
> thanks, Bruce Wallace

Could you register this as an RFE on sourceforge.net? By the way, you
can alter the handling of '@' tags in the .jsdoc_config file. When this
does get implemented, it will probably be introduced as an entry in that
file, as this is quite a customized request. If you'd like a hand with
adding this to your .jsdoc_config file, just let me know.

Gabriel