Re: [Jsdoc-user] status of XMI/UML export?

[Cameron S. <sho...@op...>]

Gabriel,
I'm very excited.  This is great.
I've just reverse engineered our JS code and I seem to be able to view 
all our class diagrams, including classes, class dependancies, functions 
and internal variables.

This is the main requirement I was looking for.
What else are you considering incorporating?

Mapbuilder people (and Gabriel),
It would be great if someone knew of a tool which can automatically 
build class diagrams and place the classes on a page for you.

Do any of the commercial UML tools do this?

We also need to think about breaking all our classes into their 
directory structures.

Gabriel Reid wrote:

>Hi Cameron,
>
>  
>
>>Have you advanced any further on the XMI export idea?  We are about to 
>>revisit our design documentation for http://mapbuilder.sf.net and it 
>>would be useful to have XMI data to support it.
>>    
>>
>
>I've just posted a version of JSDoc with basic support for XMI (and XML)
>output; it's version 1.9.3. Please give it a try and let me know what
>you'd like to see added/removed/changed/etc.
>
>To use the XMI export, use the "--format xmi" argument; for example:
>
>    ./jsdoc.pl --format xmi test.js
>
>I do have a basic XMI export working, although it's not yet properly
>integrated in JSDoc. However, I'll either post a working copy on SF.net or 
>email a copy of it to you later on this evening.
>
>Right now it just handles the class hierarchy; however, having the
>foundations down I think that filling out more functionality shouldn't
>present too much of a problem. 
>
>
>Regards,
>
>    Gabriel
>
>
>
>  
>