jsdoc-user

[Jsdoc-user] JsDoc toolkit 5.2

[Eefje C. <Eef...@ar...>]

Hi,
=20
In order to get rid of some 'recursive' problems using JsDoc from
sourceforge, I installed JsDoc toolkit 5.2.
This solves my problem regarding recursion, but some tags aren't
recognized in the toolkit.
=20
For example:
=20
1.
/**

* id of the employee selected (could be logged user).

* @field employeeId

* @type String=20

*/=20

This isn't recognized, although @field should work, I assume.

The @type tag was also usefull, so I could be redirected to the String
class...

2.

Are there alternatives for @type , @see, @return, ... in JsDoc toolkit ?

=20

Kind Regards,

Eefje.

Re: [Jsdoc-user] JsDoc toolkit 5.2

[Michael M. <mi...@gm...>]

This should be posted to the JsDoc Toolkit list, not here. And you are
not using version 5.2, you are using version 0.5.2 beta (I suspect).
Version 1.0 is going to be released in the next couple of weeks, with
API changes, at which time the 0.5 betas will become deprecated, so I
don't want to publicly answer your question about how to apply the
JDTK tags *yet*.

In short, the 1.0 release will more closely follow the tags defined in
ScriptDoc, see: http://www.scriptdoc.org/specification.htm

If you send me a bit of your actual code I can use it in a test case
and tell you exactly how to tag it. A general announcement, and
documentation, will come in early July.

Regards,
Michael

On 27/06/07, Eefje Colman <Eef...@ar...> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In order to get rid of some 'recursive' problems using JsDoc from
> sourceforge, I installed JsDoc toolkit 5.2.
> This solves my problem regarding recursion, but some tags aren't recognized
> in the toolkit.
>
> For example:
>
> 1.
>
>
> /**
>
> * id of the employee selected (could be logged user).
>
> * @field employeeId
>
> * @type String
>
> */
>
> This isn't recognized, although @field should work, I assume.
>
> The @type tag was also usefull, so I could be redirected to the String
> class...
>
> 2.
>
> Are there alternatives for @type , @see, @return, ... in JsDoc toolkit ?
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Eefje.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Jsdoc-user mailing list
> Jsd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsdoc-user
>
>

Re: [Jsdoc-user] JsDoc toolkit 5.2

[Eefje C. <Eef...@ar...>]

 Thanks for your answer!

Regarding my first issue. It works if I only put '@field' instead of
'@field employeeId'.

Kr,
Eefje.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Mathews [mailto:mi...@gm...]=20
Sent: woensdag 27 juni 2007 14:29
To: Eefje Colman; Jsd...@li...
Subject: Re: [Jsdoc-user] JsDoc toolkit 5.2

This should be posted to the JsDoc Toolkit list, not here. And you are
not using version 5.2, you are using version 0.5.2 beta (I suspect).
Version 1.0 is going to be released in the next couple of weeks, with
API changes, at which time the 0.5 betas will become deprecated, so I
don't want to publicly answer your question about how to apply the JDTK
tags *yet*.

In short, the 1.0 release will more closely follow the tags defined in
ScriptDoc, see: http://www.scriptdoc.org/specification.htm

If you send me a bit of your actual code I can use it in a test case and
tell you exactly how to tag it. A general announcement, and
documentation, will come in early July.

Regards,
Michael

On 27/06/07, Eefje Colman <Eef...@ar...> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In order to get rid of some 'recursive' problems using JsDoc from=20
> sourceforge, I installed JsDoc toolkit 5.2.
> This solves my problem regarding recursion, but some tags aren't=20
> recognized in the toolkit.
>
> For example:
>
> 1.
>
>
> /**
>
> * id of the employee selected (could be logged user).
>
> * @field employeeId
>
> * @type String
>
> */
>
> This isn't recognized, although @field should work, I assume.
>
> The @type tag was also usefull, so I could be redirected to the String

> class...
>
> 2.
>
> Are there alternatives for @type , @see, @return, ... in JsDoc toolkit
?
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Eefje.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express

> C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No=20
> limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Jsdoc-user mailing list
> Jsd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsdoc-user
>
>