From: Geoffrey K. <ge...@kn...> - 2004-06-17 10:50:40
|
I ran into this while calculating azimuths. > (eq? 180 180) #f > (= 180 180) #t > (eq? 0 0) #t > (eq? 1 1) #t > (eq? 2 2) #t > (eq? 3 3) #t > (eq? 180 180) #f After poking around, I found this: > (eq? 127 127) #t > (eq? 128 128) #f > (eq? -127 -127) #t > (eq? -128 -128) #f For now I'll use = instead of eq?. I was just wondering if this was documented. Geoffrey -- Geoffrey S. Knauth | http://knauth.org/gsk |