[JSch-users] SFTP RFCs

[Flavio O. <fo...@ho...>]

Hello Lads,

I do use JSCH(version 1.0.50) for SFTP on my application .
Running our component against a Sterling Integrator(IBM) to do a SFTP pooling is failing due to the following:

According to them when the SFTP is done with a file, their Sterling Integrator (IBM) sends a final packet and waits for a ACK from my component (which uses JSCH) but as it never get the ACK from us saying all is fine then their Sterling Integrator resend the file again and again (infinite loop). 

They mention that this is according to an RFC (have to confirm with them). Doing a quick search in google I could find the RFC 1350  https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1350. in this RFC it mention about normal termination:

Normal Termination

   The end of a transfer is marked by a DATA packet that contains
   between 0 and 511 bytes of data (i.e., Datagram length < 516).  This
   packet is acknowledged by an ACK packet like all other DATA packets.
   The host acknowledging the final DATA packet may terminate its side
   of the connection on sending the final ACK.  On the other hand,
   dallying is encouraged.  This means that the host sending the final
   ACK will wait for a while before terminating in order to retransmit
   the final ACK if it has been lost.  The acknowledger will know that
   the ACK has been lost if it receives the final DATA packet again.
   The host sending the last DATA must retransmit it until the packet is
   acknowledged or the sending host times out.  If the response is an
   ACK, the transmission was completed successfully.  If the sender of
   the data times out and is not prepared to retransmit any more, the
   transfer may still have been completed successfully, after which the
   acknowledger or network may have experienced a problem.  It is also
   possible in this case that the transfer was unsuccessful.  In any
   case, the connection has been closed.

My QUESTION IS: Do JSCH follow any RFC related to  TFTP, FTP etc? Or would it only follow the SSH RFCs? Also would any RFC for SSH have similar normal termination as described above?

So I am trying to understand if their comment makes any sense or not. I would appreciate any input here.


Cheers!

Flavio