jsapi-developer Mailing List for Java Speech API
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
schnelle
Menu
▾
▴
jsapi-developer — Developer Exchange
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Peter K. <pet...@to...> - 2021-01-21 00:48:45
|
Is this project still being supported? I'm not sure how to run the demos. The Install file says that the RTP demos are based on jlibrtp (http://jlibrtp.org), but that website doesn't exist anymore. There don't seem to be any other instructions to run the demos. I understand that I have to download Sphinx. I assume it goes with org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.sphinx4.jar, but it's not clear where to go from there. Peter |
|
From: Craig A. <can...@in...> - 2015-01-24 00:11:52
|
Using independent jar's, and especially having to compile the jar's oneself, makes this project rather difficult to use. Could you publish it to Maven Central, making it much more accessible? Thanks! ~Craig |
|
From: Dr. D. Schnelle-W. <dir...@jv...> - 2013-03-02 14:44:11
|
FYI -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: SourceForge Project Upgrade - Code Repo Complete Datum: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:04:38 +0000 Von: SourceForge.net <nor...@in...> Antwort an: no...@in... An: no...@in... Your code repository in upgraded project jsapi is now ready for use. Old repository url: http://jsapi.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jsapi New repository checkout command: svn checkout --username=schnelle svn+ssh://sch...@sv.../p/jsapi/code/trunk jsapi-code You should do a checkout using the new repository location. The old repository is read-only now. For more detailed instructions on migrating to your new repo, please see https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/community-docs/Repository%20Upgrade%20FAQ/ -- SourceForge.net has sent this mailing to you as a registered user of the SourceForge.net site to convey important information regarding your SourceForge.net account or your use of SourceForge.net services. If you have concerns about this mailing please contact our Support team per: http://sourceforge.net/support |
|
From: Dr. D. Schnelle-W. <dir...@jv...> - 2011-06-24 07:13:28
|
Hi all, I just created a wrapper for log4cplus to the java logging framework. Therefore, I started to replace all occurences if std::cout with a log4cplus call. Maybe this is also of some interest for Stefan and the mac implementation. In this case, we will have to find a better place for it. Dirk |
|
From: Dr. D. Schnelle-W. <dir...@jv...> - 2010-12-17 14:05:34
|
Renato, I think that this is difficult to have it in parallel since they share the same name. The only solution that came into my mind is to have the project settings in a separate directory. It could also be possible to have it e.g. as JsapiBridgs2008.sln or similar. The project files are named differently. Another alternative could be to have some cmake configuration and have the developers generate their own solution. Dirk > -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Cassaca [mailto:ren...@vo...] > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 2:30 PM > To: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka > Cc: jsa...@li... > Subject: Re: [Jsapi-developer] Reorg of the JSAPI project > > Wouldn´t it be possible to leave the VS2008 project file in the SVN? > > Renato > > > > Hi all, > > > > I just committed a reorg of the project layout. I separated the > > freetts and sphinx parts into separate projects (I am still having > > some discussion with the sphinx4 guys whether we should add JSAPI > > support to their repository) and also separated the demos into own > > projects. > > > > I also upgraded the settings for the SAPI bridge to visual studio 2010. > > > > I think that the project names of the SAPI and the Mac bridge should > > be renamed to include jse. > > > > Dirk > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------- > > Lotusphere 2011 > > Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, > > take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the > > era of Social Business. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d > > _______________________________________________ > > Jsapi-developer mailing list > > Jsa...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsapi-developer > > > > > |
|
From: Renato C. <ren...@vo...> - 2010-12-17 13:57:09
|
Wouldn´t it be possible to leave the VS2008 project file in the SVN? Renato > Hi all, > > I just committed a reorg of the project layout. I separated the freetts > and > sphinx parts into separate projects (I am still having some discussion > with > the sphinx4 guys whether we should add JSAPI support to their repository) > and also separated the demos into own projects. > > I also upgraded the settings for the SAPI bridge to visual studio 2010. > > I think that the project names of the SAPI and the Mac bridge should be > renamed to include jse. > > Dirk > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Lotusphere 2011 > Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how > to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment > to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Jsapi-developer mailing list > Jsa...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsapi-developer > > |
|
From: Dr. D. Schnelle-W. <dir...@jv...> - 2010-12-17 11:38:47
|
Hi all, I just committed a reorg of the project layout. I separated the freetts and sphinx parts into separate projects (I am still having some discussion with the sphinx4 guys whether we should add JSAPI support to their repository) and also separated the demos into own projects. I also upgraded the settings for the SAPI bridge to visual studio 2010. I think that the project names of the SAPI and the Mac bridge should be renamed to include jse. Dirk |
|
From: Weston P. <wes...@gm...> - 2010-10-13 14:45:53
|
Hi, My name is Weston. I came across this project mainly because I was looking for a decent SAPI implementation of the JSAPI interface. I've been having issues with the Cloudgarden implementation and would prefer an open source version anyways. I'd like to help out however is needed, I have about 4-6 hours a week to spend. I have substantial Java experience and Java has been my primary language for the past several years. In the past I've also done considerable C++ development but that was a couple of years ago. Unless otherwise requested I'll probably be spending most of my time evaluating and testing the SAPI implementation for my own purposes. -Weston |
|
From: Dr. D. Schnelle-W. <dir...@jv...> - 2010-09-28 14:48:29
|
Hi all, Maybe my guess about sphinx was wrong. I received very positive feedback for this suggestion. Dirk "Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka" <dir...@jv...> schrieb: >Please replace "ethischen" by "this" >It was auto-"corrected" ;-) > >Dirk > >"Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka" <dir...@jv...> schrieb: > >>Hi all, >> >>Currently I am working on an open source implementation of JSAPI 2. I have initial support for sphinx 4 in my repository at sourceforge but I would prefer to have ethischen as part of sphinx 4. Ethischen would also mean to have my base layer libraries in the sphinx repository. License is LGPL. >>Anything for or against that? >> >>Dirk >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >>and start using them to simplify application deployment and >>accelerate your shift to cloud computing. >>http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >>_______________________________________________ >>Cmusphinx-devel mailing list >>Cmu...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cmusphinx-devel |
|
From: Dr. D. Schnelle-W. <dir...@jv...> - 2010-09-27 23:56:42
|
Please replace "ethischen" by "this" It was auto-"corrected" ;-) Dirk "Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka" <dir...@jv...> schrieb: >Hi all, > >Currently I am working on an open source implementation of JSAPI 2. I have initial support for sphinx 4 in my repository at sourceforge but I would prefer to have ethischen as part of sphinx 4. Ethischen would also mean to have my base layer libraries in the sphinx repository. License is LGPL. >Anything for or against that? > >Dirk >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >and start using them to simplify application deployment and >accelerate your shift to cloud computing. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >_______________________________________________ >Cmusphinx-devel mailing list >Cmu...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cmusphinx-devel |
|
From: Dr. D. Schnelle-W. <dir...@jv...> - 2010-09-27 23:53:20
|
Hi all, Currently I am working on an open source implementation of JSAPI 2. I have initial support for sphinx 4 in my repository at sourceforge but I would prefer to have ethischen as part of sphinx 4. Ethischen would also mean to have my base layer libraries in the sphinx repository. License is LGPL. Anything for or against that? Dirk |
|
From: Dr. D. Schnelle-W. <dir...@jv...> - 2010-09-27 23:03:04
|
Hi Renato, Ethischen could be easyjet for FreeTTS, but I doubt that I will be able to convince the guys fromm sphinx. They waren more restrictive to introduce new libraries. Espacially with a different license. So, we can have that in FreeTTS for a start. Dirk Renato Cassaca <ren...@vo...> schrieb: > Hi all, >Instead of creating new projects... couldn't those layers be placed in >FreeTTS/Sphinx projects? They already have JSAPI1 layers.... > > >Renato > > >On 27-09-2010 11:26, Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> welcome to the JSAPI developer list. This list is intended to talk about >> problems in the development of JSAPI and to discuss the architecture. Here >> is the first point: >> >> In a short discussion that I had with Markus, we discovered that the >> implementation of FreeTTS and sphinx4 for org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.jse does not >> really fit into this layer. It is more of the kind as >> org.jvoicexmljsapi2.sapi and should be on the same level. This means that I >> would like to create two new projects: >> - org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.freetts >> - org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.sphinx4 >> >> What do you think? Any comments? >> >> Dirk >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >> and start using them to simplify application deployment and >> accelerate your shift to cloud computing. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Jsapi-developer mailing list >> Jsa...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsapi-developer >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >and start using them to simplify application deployment and >accelerate your shift to cloud computing. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >_______________________________________________ >Jsapi-developer mailing list >Jsa...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsapi-developer |
|
From: Renato C. <ren...@vo...> - 2010-09-27 22:26:13
|
Hi all, Instead of creating new projects... couldn't those layers be placed in FreeTTS/Sphinx projects? They already have JSAPI1 layers.... Renato On 27-09-2010 11:26, Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka wrote: > Hi all, > > welcome to the JSAPI developer list. This list is intended to talk about > problems in the development of JSAPI and to discuss the architecture. Here > is the first point: > > In a short discussion that I had with Markus, we discovered that the > implementation of FreeTTS and sphinx4 for org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.jse does not > really fit into this layer. It is more of the kind as > org.jvoicexmljsapi2.sapi and should be on the same level. This means that I > would like to create two new projects: > - org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.freetts > - org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.sphinx4 > > What do you think? Any comments? > > Dirk > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Jsapi-developer mailing list > Jsa...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsapi-developer > |
|
From: Dr. D. Schnelle-W. <dir...@jv...> - 2010-09-27 10:26:42
|
Hi all, welcome to the JSAPI developer list. This list is intended to talk about problems in the development of JSAPI and to discuss the architecture. Here is the first point: In a short discussion that I had with Markus, we discovered that the implementation of FreeTTS and sphinx4 for org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.jse does not really fit into this layer. It is more of the kind as org.jvoicexmljsapi2.sapi and should be on the same level. This means that I would like to create two new projects: - org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.freetts - org.jvoicexml.jsapi2.sphinx4 What do you think? Any comments? Dirk |
