RE: [Jrman-devel] GUI advances and start of a discussion...

[Gerardo H. <ma...@pr...>]

For my email address I prefer <ma...@mu...>

-----Original Message-----
From: jrm...@li...
[mailto:jrm...@li...] On Behalf Of Alessandro
Falappa
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 4:26 AM
To: jrm...@li...
Subject: Re: [Jrman-devel] GUI advances and start of a discussion...


Jorge Vargas wrote:
> Alessandro,
>
> Screenshots look great but i don't know if we should
> put checkboxes for some options, maybe it's better to
> include a TextField for extra options, if we want to
> add some option we must change UI and on the other
> hand we don't know how many options JrMan will have.

This is a good suggestion (easy to implement and able to use new of
options with an older UI), even if I intended to keep the option pane
updated as new options get in just because some options could
interrelate and need the UI to react accordingly (for example when
checking/unchecking the "render frame subset" checkbox enables/disables
the two "from" and "to" spinners).

> About the dialog box i vote for our names and email's

Fine.
Jorge Vargas <edi...@ya...>
Gerardo Horvilleur <ma...@pr...>
Are the above addresses correct?
What's Elmer Garduno address? Is it ega...@us... ?

> Now about CVS repository (i'm sorry not including
> original text here):
> a) We should preserve it until we release a major
> version.

Do you mean the project is not mature enough to justify such a
reorganization?

> b) I agree. There are a lot of files now.
> c) I think we must put all libraries that project
> needs in one CVS module.

This is good as well.

> d) Maybe only extract development rib files ant put
> them in other CVS module.

Yes, this was what I was suggesting.

> e) It's better to manage them one by one (if apply).

Fine as well, I was thinking of "lazy" or "occasional" developers who
"want it all and now" ^__^

> f) Maybe we could use a prefix in their names.

This is only a temporary solution, I prefer wait until searchpaths are
implemented then reorganize into directories.

> g) How many time did the generation take for these
> files??? What resources?? because sometimes is better
> to spend time downloading that computing them (if it's posible).

I did not time them but I guess a fraction of download time even on
moderately fast connections.

> Regards.
>
> Jorge Vargas G.

Cheers.

--
Alessandro Falappa



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the
breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Jrman-devel mailing list
Jrm...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jrman-devel