Actually, to avoid problems when the parallelogram isn't flat (which
is almost always the case), we split each parallelogram into two
triangles. That's why we only have three points for each micropolygon.
All our micropolygons are triangles.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Josh Stratton<str...@gm...> wrote:
> I'm not sure if anyone is on this list anymore, but I thought I'd try.
> Looking at the dicing code, it looks like the micropolygons are
> always parallelograms as they only take 3 points. Not generic quads.
> Is this problematic when the original patch isn't a parallelogram
> leading to cracks between the micropolygons?
>
> Josh
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Jrman-devel mailing list
> Jrm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jrman-devel
>
--
Gerardo Horvilleur
ma...@si...
5282-3314
044 55 2709-0509
|
