Regarding the use of script vs executable.
1) I am not sure, would have to check it, but I am guessing that java license allows for substitution of its parts, including the executable.
2) I do not think it goes for much gain to have a java + parameter command to bootstrap over simply having a script named: "jrepl" to launch the repl.
3) I think the sooner the app goes into java the better.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Currently, the cpp file only checks if Java or JREPL should be started according to the given arguments. The actual handling is done in JREPL (Java). Or do you disagree with substituting java.exe?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Regarding the use of script vs executable.
1) I am not sure, would have to check it, but I am guessing that java license allows for substitution of its parts, including the executable.
2) I do not think it goes for much gain to have a java + parameter command to bootstrap over simply having a script named: "jrepl" to launch the repl.
3) I think the sooner the app goes into java the better.
@3) what do you mean?
@3) I mean that things should be handled from java, command line parameters included.
Currently, the cpp file only checks if Java or JREPL should be started according to the given arguments. The actual handling is done in JREPL (Java). Or do you disagree with substituting java.exe?