Menu
▾
▴
jquery-developer
|
From: Ed M. <emc...@cs...> - 2004-05-31 21:19:03
|
Hi, I had downloaded Eclipse M9 to try Jquery, and there are two problems I notice. One is that there is the following error: AST.parseCompilationUnit(cu, true, null, null); (Error: two many arguments - it doesn't like the last two args) on the following files: ca.ubc.jquery.engine.ClassFileBucket and ca.ubc.jquery.engine.CompilationUnitBucket And secondly, JQuery does not appear as an option in the "show views" panel. Should I still go ahead and post this version of JQuery to SourceForge? thanks. Ed |
|
From: Andrew E. <ad...@cs...> - 2004-05-31 22:01:10
|
It should be working for M8. I had thought that there was an api freeze after M8. Are we using any internal apis? Anyway, if it is indeed working for M8 (and it should be), then I think it would be ok to post it, but with a note saying that this is the M8 release and doesn't work for M9 yet. Does this work for everyone? --a Ed McCormick wrote: > Hi, > > I had downloaded Eclipse M9 to try Jquery, and there are two problems I > notice. > > One is that there is the following error: > AST.parseCompilationUnit(cu, true, null, null); (Error: two many > arguments - it doesn't like the last two args) > > on the following files: > ca.ubc.jquery.engine.ClassFileBucket > and > ca.ubc.jquery.engine.CompilationUnitBucket > > And secondly, JQuery does not appear as an option in the "show views" > panel. > > Should I still go ahead and post this version of JQuery to SourceForge? > > thanks. > Ed > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > jquery-developer mailing list > jqu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer |
|
From: Doug J. <dj...@ya...> - 2004-05-31 22:09:06
|
Sounds good to me. It's probably a good idea to have an M8 version available for download even if it turns out to be a minor fix to make it work with M9. Doug --- Andrew Eisenberg <ad...@cs...> wrote: > It should be working for M8. I had thought that there was an api freeze > after > M8. Are we using any internal apis? > > Anyway, if it is indeed working for M8 (and it should be), then I think it > would > be ok to post it, but with a note saying that this is the M8 release and > doesn't > work for M9 yet. > > Does this work for everyone? > > --a > > Ed McCormick wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I had downloaded Eclipse M9 to try Jquery, and there are two problems I > > notice. > > > > One is that there is the following error: > > AST.parseCompilationUnit(cu, true, null, null); (Error: two many > > arguments - it doesn't like the last two args) > > > > on the following files: > > ca.ubc.jquery.engine.ClassFileBucket > > and > > ca.ubc.jquery.engine.CompilationUnitBucket > > > > And secondly, JQuery does not appear as an option in the "show views" > > panel. > > > > Should I still go ahead and post this version of JQuery to SourceForge? > > > > thanks. > > Ed > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > jquery-developer mailing list > > jqu...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > jquery-developer mailing list > jqu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer |
|
From: Ed M. <emc...@cs...> - 2004-06-05 05:10:41
|
Hey Guys, I was hoping to get JQuery version 3.0 packaged and up on the net tonight, but I'm having some problems. (actually, i've been working on this for a few nights now and Brian and I worked for a while tonight) The first issue I'm having is trouble with the imports. I think you guys mentioned this at one point. (having trouble even with org.eclipse until a refresh is performed). Whatever is causing that problem may be at the root of this one too: When I build Jquery using Ant and then try to run it, Eclipse can't find ca.ubc.jquery.gui.JQueryView and ca.ubc.JQueryPlugin. Has this worked for either of you? Either way, if either of you get a chance, i'd really appreciate a hand on this one. thanks! Ed Doug Janzen wrote: >Sounds good to me. It's probably a good idea to have an M8 version available >for download even if it turns out to be a minor fix to make it work with M9. > >Doug > >--- Andrew Eisenberg <ad...@cs...> wrote: > > >>It should be working for M8. I had thought that there was an api freeze >>after >>M8. Are we using any internal apis? >> >>Anyway, if it is indeed working for M8 (and it should be), then I think it >>would >>be ok to post it, but with a note saying that this is the M8 release and >>doesn't >>work for M9 yet. >> >>Does this work for everyone? >> >>--a >> >>Ed McCormick wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I had downloaded Eclipse M9 to try Jquery, and there are two problems I >>>notice. >>> >>>One is that there is the following error: >>>AST.parseCompilationUnit(cu, true, null, null); (Error: two many >>>arguments - it doesn't like the last two args) >>> >>>on the following files: >>>ca.ubc.jquery.engine.ClassFileBucket >>>and >>>ca.ubc.jquery.engine.CompilationUnitBucket >>> >>>And secondly, JQuery does not appear as an option in the "show views" >>>panel. >>> >>>Should I still go ahead and post this version of JQuery to SourceForge? >>> >>>thanks. >>>Ed >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >>>Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. >>>Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >>>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >>>_______________________________________________ >>>jquery-developer mailing list >>>jqu...@li... >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer >>> >>> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >>Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. >>Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >>_______________________________________________ >>jquery-developer mailing list >>jqu...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer >> >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. >Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >_______________________________________________ >jquery-developer mailing list >jqu...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer > > |
|
From: Andrew E. <ad...@cs...> - 2004-06-05 17:28:22
|
I think I got it working. I put it in my home directory (~ade/), world readable. There are two zip files: jquery-2004-Jun-05-dist.zip jquery-2004-Jun-05-project.zip The dist file is just the files needed to run jquery and the project zip is all of the source files, etc. Probably both should go on the website. This version should be fine since I installed it into my plugins directory and got it working. Maybe on Monday we can figure out what's happening withyour configuration. Ed McCormick wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I was hoping to get JQuery version 3.0 packaged and up on the net > tonight, but I'm having some problems. (actually, i've been working on > this for a few nights now and Brian and I worked for a while tonight) > > The first issue I'm having is trouble with the imports. I think you guys > mentioned this at one point. (having trouble even with org.eclipse until > a refresh is performed). > > Whatever is causing that problem may be at the root of this one too: > When I build Jquery using Ant and then try to run it, Eclipse can't find > ca.ubc.jquery.gui.JQueryView and ca.ubc.JQueryPlugin. > > Has this worked for either of you? > Either way, if either of you get a chance, i'd really appreciate a hand > on this one. > thanks! > Ed > > Doug Janzen wrote: > >> Sounds good to me. It's probably a good idea to have an M8 version >> available >> for download even if it turns out to be a minor fix to make it work >> with M9. >> >> Doug >> >> --- Andrew Eisenberg <ad...@cs...> wrote: >> >> >>> It should be working for M8. I had thought that there was an api freeze >>> after M8. Are we using any internal apis? >>> >>> Anyway, if it is indeed working for M8 (and it should be), then I >>> think it >>> would be ok to post it, but with a note saying that this is the M8 >>> release and >>> doesn't work for M9 yet. >>> >>> Does this work for everyone? >>> >>> --a >>> >>> Ed McCormick wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I had downloaded Eclipse M9 to try Jquery, and there are two >>>> problems I notice. >>>> >>>> One is that there is the following error: >>>> AST.parseCompilationUnit(cu, true, null, null); (Error: two many >>>> arguments - it doesn't like the last two args) >>>> >>>> on the following files: >>>> ca.ubc.jquery.engine.ClassFileBucket >>>> and >>>> ca.ubc.jquery.engine.CompilationUnitBucket >>>> >>>> And secondly, JQuery does not appear as an option in the "show >>>> views" panel. >>>> >>>> Should I still go ahead and post this version of JQuery to SourceForge? >>>> >>>> thanks. >>>> Ed >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >>>> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle >>>> 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jquery-developer mailing list >>>> jqu...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >>> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle >>> 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jquery-developer mailing list >>> jqu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer >>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle >> 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> jquery-developer mailing list >> jqu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. > >> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one > > installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and > evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 > _______________________________________________ > jquery-developer mailing list > jqu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer |
|
From: Brian de A. <bs...@cs...> - 2004-06-05 06:00:03
|
It was really quite a bizarre experience. We were seeing things
as described in bug 50448:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=50448
Comment #26 says:
> As for the current behaviour, we don't believe it to be a problem
> (compatibility or otherwise). Comment 19 describes exactly what is
> going on.
>
> The first thing to note is that 2.1 plugins continue to work
> unchanged.
>
> Next, plugins marked as <?eclipse version=3.0?> and requiring
> runtime.compatibility also continue to work unchanged.
>
> It is only if you are wanting to get off the compatibility layer
> (why?) that you actually need to change your plugin class to have
> the zero arg constructor.
Brian.
--
Brian de Alwis | Graduate student | Software Practices Lab | UBC
"There is much pleasure to be gained in useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
From: Andrew E. <ad...@cs...> - 2004-06-05 21:46:37
|
Strange...not sure I understand what the problem was. What version of eclipse are/were you running, Ed? Brian de Alwis wrote: > It was really quite a bizarre experience. We were seeing things > as described in bug 50448: > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=50448 > > Comment #26 says: > > >>As for the current behaviour, we don't believe it to be a problem >>(compatibility or otherwise). Comment 19 describes exactly what is >>going on. >> >>The first thing to note is that 2.1 plugins continue to work >>unchanged. >> >>Next, plugins marked as <?eclipse version=3.0?> and requiring >>runtime.compatibility also continue to work unchanged. >> >>It is only if you are wanting to get off the compatibility layer >>(why?) that you actually need to change your plugin class to have >>the zero arg constructor. > > > Brian. > |
|
From: Ed M. <emc...@cs...> - 2004-06-05 22:44:00
|
build M8. of 3.0. Although now that i've reinstalled eclipse (the plugin you gave me works now) - I doubt I can recreate the same problem. Stop by anytime if you want to talk about it though. Andrew Eisenberg wrote: > Strange...not sure I understand what the problem was. What version of > eclipse are/were you running, Ed? > > Brian de Alwis wrote: > >> It was really quite a bizarre experience. We were seeing things >> as described in bug 50448: >> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=50448 >> >> Comment #26 says: >> >> >>> As for the current behaviour, we don't believe it to be a problem >>> (compatibility or otherwise). Comment 19 describes exactly what is >>> going on. >>> >>> The first thing to note is that 2.1 plugins continue to work >>> unchanged. >>> >>> Next, plugins marked as <?eclipse version=3.0?> and requiring >>> runtime.compatibility also continue to work unchanged. >>> >>> It is only if you are wanting to get off the compatibility layer >>> (why?) that you actually need to change your plugin class to have >>> the zero arg constructor. >> >> >> >> Brian. >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. > >> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one > > installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and > evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 > _______________________________________________ > jquery-developer mailing list > jqu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer |
|
From: Ed M. <emc...@cs...> - 2004-06-06 22:36:25
|
The JQuery download page now lists version 3.0 and directs downloads to SourceForge. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/labs/spl/projects/jquery/download.htm Ed McCormick wrote: > build M8. of 3.0. Although now that i've reinstalled eclipse (the > plugin you gave me works now) - I doubt I can recreate the same > problem. Stop by anytime if you want to talk about it though. > > Andrew Eisenberg wrote: > >> Strange...not sure I understand what the problem was. What version >> of eclipse are/were you running, Ed? >> >> Brian de Alwis wrote: >> >>> It was really quite a bizarre experience. We were seeing things >>> as described in bug 50448: >>> >>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=50448 >>> >>> Comment #26 says: >>> >>> >>>> As for the current behaviour, we don't believe it to be a problem >>>> (compatibility or otherwise). Comment 19 describes exactly what is >>>> going on. >>>> >>>> The first thing to note is that 2.1 plugins continue to work >>>> unchanged. >>>> >>>> Next, plugins marked as <?eclipse version=3.0?> and requiring >>>> runtime.compatibility also continue to work unchanged. >>>> >>>> It is only if you are wanting to get off the compatibility layer >>>> (why?) that you actually need to change your plugin class to have >>>> the zero arg constructor. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Brian. >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >> >>> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one >> >> >> installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and >> evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 >> _______________________________________________ >> jquery-developer mailing list >> jqu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jquery-developer > > > |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X