You can subscribe to this list here.
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-17 15:16:54
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5038188 By: amasun Hi, I try to print an existing pdf file with jpod: FileLocator locator = new FileLocator("c:\\ex.pdf"); PDDocument document = PDDocument.createFromLocator(locator); Then I search for a print method or something like this but I found nothing. Is it possible ? Best regards, ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-17 09:37:38
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5037600 By: andreashaufler I my eyes the problem is, that JPOD currently provides the same features as PDFBox does. It's way better structured and very well done, but it lacks documentation and examples. So right now, I can understand that people prefer PDFBox and therefore don't help to improve JPOD. Adding rasterization support and some documentation would totally change the whole picture. As business model you have the choices: 1) You are the only maintainer of the library and release it under GPL and under a Commercial license (this is what MySQL does). Your benefit: You may get a lot of testers via the GPL version and receive a lot of bug reports and all this. 2) You set it under LGPL or equivalent, you can accept additional committers and you can sell professional support, trainings, etc. However, if you want others to be able to commit code to the library and help to improve it, you have to put it under LGPL, because otherwise you really cannot use it even for your own commercial products. I'd be happy with either approch. best regards Andy ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-17 08:10:37
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5037411 By: ham_scireum IMHO I see two strategys of open source. The first one is the one you mentioned. The licensor keeps his code and maintains it by himself and releases the older versions as GPL code. The benefit of this strategy is: market awareness because lots of people can use the code for free. The improvements in the GPL code have to be synced into your own codebase (lots of work). The second strategy is to release it under the LGPL and enable other companys to earn money with it and also enable them to team up with you in points of developement. I'm absolutely sure that you will have much more effect on the second strategy, cause you'll be the first java libary providing PDF rendering capabilitys. An the lack of this feature is really a pain in the ass for the java world. I think jpod has the oportunity to become the leading Java PDF libary with its robustness, its text extraction features and als its rednering capabilitys. So for you, you will get better, more reviewed and tested code which is essential for your own software, you'll get very good PR as the maintainer of the most popular pdf libary, you can support the libary and earn money with support and developement services. You can write an documentation and sell it as a book. And you can still sell your CABAReT produkt even if you directly use the community code. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-17 07:28:54
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5037339 By: mtraut To see what you can do with jPod - have a look at www.cabaret-solutions.com. To have an impression of the currently open sourced code, have a look at the examples. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-17 07:21:35
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5037329 By: sankotm Hi, I was looking on different PDF libraries to see how much they can do, so I did not have anything special in mind. Thanks ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-17 06:58:26
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5037299 By: mtraut Still, as we are the licensor we are free to provide CABAReT (and others!) with commercial licenses while the community has access to the GPL version. Maybe we are doing it wrong but until now there is no (0, zero) improvement / addition to jPod from outside. So, probably i have to look for the benefit elsewehere :-) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-17 06:52:23
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5037288 By: mtraut how true this is: >> Only if a company can earn money with wot they do, they will invest in the libary. What is our benefit in keeping quality and features up (besides the pure pleasure of good code, which is a good actuator itself). What do you think is a win-win business model for us as the provider of the whole library (not only a bug fix in leisure time). How can we participate in commercial success? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 20:58:28
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5036601 By: ham_scireum Hey there, I totally agree with Andy. Just look a the lots of successfull Projects with developement fokus (TomCat, Glassfish, PostGres and so on...). All these Projects use the LGPL or a BSD style licence. Only if a company can earn money with wot they do, they will invest in the libary. I dont see any developers that say hey, PDF Bugs are so sweet I'll fix em in my leisure time. I think bottom line a BSD style licence like Apache or LGPL will bring you more benefits. Greets Mike ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 20:47:36
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5036579 By: andreashaufler Hi, I'm not too much into licenses but AFAIK, if you release it under GPL you provide it to the "open source community" if the project then envolves and receives external input you cannot use this extended library in your commercial product CABARet Stage unless you put it under the GPL as well. Therefore I'd suggest to use LGPL, BSD, Apache or any equivalent, because then you and others can work together and benefit from the improvments made. best regards Andy As I said, I'm not too much into licenses, feel free to correct me ;-) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 17:59:32
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5036262 By: mtraut regarding the release discussion, see above. regarding your test documents - we are interested in the documents that did not render correctly. maybe you can provide us with documents/information/bug reports. did we fail on PDF syntax, content stream syntax or semantics? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 17:54:52
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5036250 By: mtraut ... see new post at "Open Discussion" ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 17:53:40
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5036249 By: mtraut ... cross post... -> go to "open discussion" For the upcoming release (august) we are planning to support AWT and SWT rendering. As we use this quite for a while internally (CABAReT Stage), we believe this is mature and a really interesting component. Up to now i just didn't find anything comparable. So, thats the problem. There is really much work in this component and we are not sure if we should use a BSD or a GPL license for it. So, besides the fact that we ARE going to release this code, perhaps you will participate in a discussion on the license type... ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727493 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 17:52:42
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5036247 By: mtraut For the upcoming release (august) we are planning to support AWT and SWT rendering. As we use this quite for a while internally (CABAReT Stage), we believe this is mature and a really interesting component. Up to now i just didn't find anything comparable. So, thats the problem. There is really much work in this component and we are not sure if we should use a BSD or a GPL license for it. So, besides the fact that we ARE going to release this code, perhaps you will participate in a discussion on the license type... ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 17:46:58
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5036241 By: mtraut sorry - this message got totally ignored as i did not monitor this form until now. excuses... and - to answer your question: No. There is just not enough time in this life to get this done, from sophisticated color spaces over XFA up to tagged PDF... We support a very broad subset of the spec, very sound in the basics (syntactic layer, data structures), reasonable rendering support (not enough maybe for a publishing program), good high level semantics (PD objects). Is there anything special you are looking for? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 12:02:42
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5035531 By: andreashaufler Hi everyone, were small company that also evaluates JPOD for rendering an manipulating pdfs. We have a lot of experience of doing so with PDFBox but the rendering code is just too messy to make it work. JPOD looks like a nice and well structured alternative, but as mentioned above we need rasteriziation functionality. Now that Q2 is almost over I wonder if the release date is already set? If not, might it be possible to provide a binary version as long as the code is not clean enough? We'd really like to use, and therefore help to enhance, JPOD, but this is a killer-criteria for us. Feel free to contact me: aha...@sc... best regards Andreas Haufler ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 10:54:08
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5035409 By: ham_scireum Hello there, i want to ask for the nice rendering feature in JPOD. I tried about 50.000 PDF Files with PDFBox and PDFBox crashed some times. Nearly all these PDF Files could be opened with Cabaret. If it is possible to display a file it should be possible to render the same File into a Imagefile. So what is the planning for the release of the rendering feature in JPOD? I think a big audience is looking forward to this feature! ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 06:20:17
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5034925 By: mtraut PDFBox is fine, especially famous for its text abilities! Hope you will get along. Let us know what we have to do to improve out lib! ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-15 17:02:58
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5033914 By: fallen82 Thanks alot... Have tried pdfbox concurrently, a very good program and writing to textfile is very effective. The only setback is the original formatting of spaces in a table from a pdf is not kept when converted. Thanks a lot for the help and advice. Welcome any more valuable tips or sharings =) Cheers ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-07 20:57:21
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5014782 By: mtraut ...another tip: maybe you should have another look at PDFBox - famous for its text extraction. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-06 21:21:57
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5013004 By: fallen82 i see, thanks a lot for the reply look forward to any coding created that could help me in this aspect in converting a pdf to a text file Regards Alex ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-06 05:55:33
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5011463 By: mtraut Text extraction is just "rendering to a virtual device". While not yet part of the public release, there is code doing this in the "snippets" download. The upcoming release will contain the improved version of this utility. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-05 18:17:50
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5010480 By: fallen82 Hi, I am new to jPod. Can anyone tell me or share the codes on how to extract the whole pdf and write it into a text file. Hope that there is already someone with the codes avaliable. Thanks a lot Alex ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-03 12:23:28
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5004708 By: sankotm Hi, does jPod support full PDF Specification ? Michal ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727491 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-02-23 01:37:31
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=4795441 By: zilles The summary mentions that jPod is a manipulation and rendering api. I'm very excited by the examples, but they appear to only show the manipulation features. Has the rendering API been released yet? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=727492 |