Re: [Jointtrack-users] The JOINTTRACK New Version

[Mu, S. <smu...@gm...>]

Amir,

Please refer to ChangeLog.txt for changes.

The transparent rendering feature in the new version (2.1.3) can improve 
accuracy for natural bone  measurements. Accuracy really depends on your 
image quality, image size, shape of the model, and other factors. Please 
refer to literatures for numbers, where RMS errors are typically 
~0.5-1mm for in-plane translations and ~0.5degree for rotations. Example 
literature:

1.    Moro-oka T, Hamai S, Miura H, et al. 2007. Can magnetic resonance 
imaging-derived bone models be used for accurate motion measurement with 
single-plane three-dimensional shape registration? J Orthop Res 25: 867-872.
2.    Fregly BJ, Rahman HA, Banks SA. 2005. Theoretical accuracy of 
model-based shape matching for measuring natural knee kinematics with 
single-plane fluoroscopy. J Biomech Eng 127: 692-699.

Shang



amir wrote:
>
> What parts is added to the New version ? and How much does the new 
> version have accuracy, in
>
>
> translation and Rotation?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jointtrack-users mailing list
> Joi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jointtrack-users
>