From: Joerg K. W. <we...@in...> - 2004-04-29 09:18:42
|
Hi all, > I don't think anyone can restrict atom pair to match a specific descriptor... > it's something like making "windows" a registered trade mark. "Atom pair" is > a general term and cannot be restricted to just denote on descriptor. It's, as i said, a object oriented design question. I prefer as most general objects as possible, so if the actual AtomPair supports also a distance variable (must not be 1) and an occurence count variable i like only one object. If you think this is overhead for all (also primitive) Atom-BondWhatever-Atom definitions (greater space complexity) i would prefer two different inherited interfaces ? Nikolas, any comments ?:-) > Fortunately, we will have dictionaries... where the descriptor "AtomPair" can > be explaned... Which one ? Kind regards, Joerg -- Dipl. Chem. Joerg K. Wegner Center of Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT) Department of Computer Architecture Univ. Tuebingen, Sand 1, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany Phone: (+49/0) 7071 29 78970 Fax: (+49/0) 7071 29 5091 E-Mail: mailto:we...@in... WWW: http://www-ra.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de -- Never mistake motion for action. (E. Hemingway) Never mistake action for meaningful action. (Hugo Kubinyi,2004) |