From: E.L. W. <eg...@sc...> - 2004-04-29 07:01:23
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 28 April 2004 11:05, Joerg K. Wegner wrote: > > Do you consider AtomPair a "descriptor"? I noticed it is present in > > JOELib. Octet also has an AtomPair interface. However, in Octet, AtomPa= ir > > simply represents an association between two atoms (no electrons involv= ed > > - that happens through BondingSystem). To find all the atoms that are > > associated in a Molecule, use Molecule.iterateAtomPairs(). Your point > > about hashCode() is well-taken. > > Not i'm taking it as a descriptor. IT IS a descriptor in medicinal > chemistry community. So i've no problem with this definition, but there > are already some papers out there which uses the same name ! > You can generalize, if you add distance and occurence variables. But > here also a atom can be a more abstract label than a simple atom, e.g. a > mix of special atom properties. > So i would prefer a redesign or at least another name. I don't think anyone can restrict atom pair to match a specific descriptor.= =2E.=20 it's something like making "windows" a registered trade mark. "Atom pair" i= s=20 a general term and cannot be restricted to just denote on descriptor. =46ortunately, we will have dictionaries... where the descriptor "AtomPair"= can=20 be explaned...=20 Egon =2D --=20 eg...@sc... PhD on Molecular Representation in Chemometrics Nijmegen University http://www.cac.sci.kun.nl/people/egonw/ GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (SunOS) iD8DBQFAkKg4d9R8I9Yza6YRAnBEAJ45WFMUlkBrYxAII5wR/om+hD/obgCguvDt Rt5MxFFsSquEA8lwT1dkKzU=3D =3Do4ja =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |