From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-11-07 16:01:33
|
Hi! The release of joe-2.9.7 is upcoming. CVS tree is up to date, release on sourceforge is prepared, but due to some upload problems, it is postponed until tommorow. For the impatient ones: cvs co joe-current -r joe_2_9_7 Happy testing and using. co-maintainer Vita Samel P.S. Any comments are welcome. |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-11-07 16:32:41
|
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: Hi, > The release of joe-2.9.7 is upcoming. CVS tree is up to date, release on > sourceforge is prepared, but due to some upload problems, it is postponed > until tommorow. For the impatient ones: > > cvs co joe-current -r joe_2_9_7 > > > Happy testing and using. > > co-maintainer Vita Samel > > > P.S. Any comments are welcome. autoconf.h.in is missing from CVS. pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-11-07 16:58:01
|
> > The release of joe-2.9.7 is upcoming. CVS tree is up to date, release on > > sourceforge is prepared, but due to some upload problems, it is postponed > > until tommorow. For the impatient ones: > > > > cvs co joe-current -r joe_2_9_7 > > > > > > Happy testing and using. > > > > co-maintainer Vita Samel > > > > > > P.S. Any comments are welcome. > > autoconf.h.in is missing from CVS. Please, read carefully the new file README.cvs from the CVS repository (especially paragraph beginning with: "In case you aren't used to running autoconf"). Cheers, Vita |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-11-07 17:03:47
|
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > > > The release of joe-2.9.7 is upcoming. CVS tree is up to date, release on > > > sourceforge is prepared, but due to some upload problems, it is postponed > > > until tommorow. For the impatient ones: > > > > > > cvs co joe-current -r joe_2_9_7 > > > > > > > > > Happy testing and using. > > > > > > co-maintainer Vita Samel > > > > > > > > > P.S. Any comments are welcome. > > > > autoconf.h.in is missing from CVS. > > Please, read carefully the new file README.cvs from the CVS repository > (especially paragraph beginning with: "In case you aren't used to running > autoconf"). My apologiese. Forgot to run autoheader :-( Sorry again. pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-11-07 17:31:25
|
Please apply the following patch before releasing: --- configure.ac~ Wed Nov 7 18:13:55 2001 +++ configure.ac Wed Nov 7 18:21:01 2001 @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ fi AC_HEADER_TIOCGWINSZ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([errno.h fcntl.h locale.h sgtty.h stdlib.h string.h sys/ioctl.h sys/param.h sys/time.h unistd.h utime.h]) -AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h]) +AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h sys/types.h]) # Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics. AC_C_PROTOTYPES Without it joe fails to compile. pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-11-08 07:09:04
|
> Please apply the following patch before releasing: > > --- configure.ac~ Wed Nov 7 18:13:55 2001 > +++ configure.ac Wed Nov 7 18:21:01 2001 > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ > fi > AC_HEADER_TIOCGWINSZ > AC_CHECK_HEADERS([errno.h fcntl.h locale.h sgtty.h stdlib.h string.h sys/ioctl.h sys/param.h sys/time.h unistd.h utime.h]) > -AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h]) > +AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h sys/types.h]) > > # Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics. > AC_C_PROTOTYPES > > Without it joe fails to compile. O.K., I'm looking at the code and probably found the mistake. But can you send me config.log from the ./configure run? I'd like to know what the path to the non-testing of sys/types.h is. Cheers, Vita |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-11-08 10:47:46
|
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > > Please apply the following patch before releasing: > > > > --- configure.ac~ Wed Nov 7 18:13:55 2001 > > +++ configure.ac Wed Nov 7 18:21:01 2001 > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ > > fi > > AC_HEADER_TIOCGWINSZ > > AC_CHECK_HEADERS([errno.h fcntl.h locale.h sgtty.h stdlib.h string.h sys/ioctl.h sys/param.h sys/time.h unistd.h utime.h]) > > -AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h]) > > +AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h sys/types.h]) > > > > # Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics. > > AC_C_PROTOTYPES > > > > Without it joe fails to compile. > > O.K., I'm looking at the code and probably found the mistake. But > can you send me config.log from the ./configure run? I'd like to know what > the path to the non-testing of sys/types.h is. config.log with the patch or without? Without it HAVE_SYS_TIME_H is not defined and causes pid_t not to be defined. pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-11-08 12:16:42
|
> > > --- configure.ac~ Wed Nov 7 18:13:55 2001 > > > +++ configure.ac Wed Nov 7 18:21:01 2001 > > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ > > > fi > > > AC_HEADER_TIOCGWINSZ > > > AC_CHECK_HEADERS([errno.h fcntl.h locale.h sgtty.h stdlib.h string.h sys/ioctl.h sys/param.h sys/time.h unistd.h utime.h]) > > > -AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h]) > > > +AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h sys/types.h]) > > > > > > # Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics. > > > AC_C_PROTOTYPES > > > > > > Without it joe fails to compile. > > > > O.K., I'm looking at the code and probably found the mistake. But > > can you send me config.log from the ./configure run? I'd like to know what > > the path to the non-testing of sys/types.h is. > > config.log with the patch or without? Without it HAVE_SYS_TIME_H is not ^^^^^^ TYPES_H ??? > defined and causes pid_t not to be defined. The problem is when HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined and therefore pid_t is not known, pid_t should be defined to int. Or am I wrong? Vita |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-11-08 13:36:13
|
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > > > > --- configure.ac~ Wed Nov 7 18:13:55 2001 > > > > +++ configure.ac Wed Nov 7 18:21:01 2001 > > > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ > > > > fi > > > > AC_HEADER_TIOCGWINSZ > > > > AC_CHECK_HEADERS([errno.h fcntl.h locale.h sgtty.h stdlib.h string.h sys/ioctl.h sys/param.h sys/time.h unistd.h utime.h]) > > > > -AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h]) > > > > +AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h sys/types.h]) > > > > > > > > # Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics. > > > > AC_C_PROTOTYPES > > > > > > > > Without it joe fails to compile. > > > > > > O.K., I'm looking at the code and probably found the mistake. But > > > can you send me config.log from the ./configure run? I'd like to know what > > > the path to the non-testing of sys/types.h is. > > > > config.log with the patch or without? Without it HAVE_SYS_TIME_H is not > ^^^^^^ TYPES_H ??? Yup. Sorry. > > defined and causes pid_t not to be defined. > > The problem is when HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined and therefore pid_t is > not known, pid_t should be defined to int. Or am I wrong? In fact thera are two problems. One you just mentioned. Second HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is _never_ defined without the patch above. In other words: configure didn't defined HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H (it didn't even check for it) although I have it in the standard location. pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-11-08 14:28:51
|
> > > > > --- configure.ac~ Wed Nov 7 18:13:55 2001 > > > > > +++ configure.ac Wed Nov 7 18:21:01 2001 > > > > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ > > > > > fi > > > > > AC_HEADER_TIOCGWINSZ > > > > > AC_CHECK_HEADERS([errno.h fcntl.h locale.h sgtty.h stdlib.h string.h sys/ioctl.h sys/param.h sys/time.h unistd.h utime.h]) > > > > > -AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h]) > > > > > +AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ncurses.h curses.h sys/dirent.h time.h pwd.h paths.h term.h sys/stat.h sys/wait.h sys/types.h]) > > > > > > > > > > # Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics. > > > > > AC_C_PROTOTYPES > > > > > > > > > > Without it joe fails to compile. > > > > > > > > O.K., I'm looking at the code and probably found the mistake. But > > > > can you send me config.log from the ./configure run? I'd like to know what > > > > the path to the non-testing of sys/types.h is. > > > > > > config.log with the patch or without? Without it HAVE_SYS_TIME_H is not both (if you can) > > > defined and causes pid_t not to be defined. > > > > The problem is when HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined and therefore pid_t is > > not known, pid_t should be defined to int. Or am I wrong? > > In fact thera are two problems. One you just mentioned. Second > HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is _never_ defined without the patch above. > In other words: configure didn't defined HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H (it didn't even > check for it) although I have it in the standard location. sys/types.h is not anywhere in configure.ac but is checked internaly by 'checking for ANSI C header files' (if you don't have ANSI C header files, it does not check for sys/types.h) - check in config.log. I'll send you prepared joe-2.9.7 (privately) and please, test it, if it has the problem too. Vita |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-11-08 14:48:04
|
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > both (if you can) Sure. Will send you in a couple of minutes. > > > > defined and causes pid_t not to be defined. > > > > > > The problem is when HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined and therefore pid_t is > > > not known, pid_t should be defined to int. Or am I wrong? > > > > In fact thera are two problems. One you just mentioned. Second > > HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is _never_ defined without the patch above. > > In other words: configure didn't defined HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H (it didn't even > > check for it) although I have it in the standard location. > > sys/types.h is not anywhere in configure.ac but is checked internaly by > 'checking for ANSI C header files' (if you don't have ANSI C header files, > it does not check for sys/types.h) - check in config.log. No. Can't see checking for sys/types.h. May it be the problem that I'm using autoconf 2.50? > I'll send you prepared joe-2.9.7 (privately) and please, test it, if it has > the problem too. No. It does compile. With a hundreds of warnings ;-) pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-11-08 15:13:44
|
> > > > > defined and causes pid_t not to be defined. > > > > > > > > The problem is when HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined and therefore pid_t is > > > > not known, pid_t should be defined to int. Or am I wrong? > > > > > > In fact thera are two problems. One you just mentioned. Second > > > HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is _never_ defined without the patch above. > > > In other words: configure didn't defined HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H (it didn't even > > > check for it) although I have it in the standard location. > > > > sys/types.h is not anywhere in configure.ac but is checked internaly by > > 'checking for ANSI C header files' (if you don't have ANSI C header files, > > it does not check for sys/types.h) - check in config.log. > > No. Can't see checking for sys/types.h. May it be the problem that I'm > using autoconf 2.50? Grrrrr, maybe you should read the README.cvs one more time (now section beginning with: '!!! Important note !!!' ;-))) (you had to change AC_PREREQ(2.52) to AC_PREREQ(2.50) to make it buildable, hadn't you???) Cheers, Vita P.S. Now I think this problem is solved, so I'm going to release joe-2.9.7. |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-11-08 15:24:44
|
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > > > > > > defined and causes pid_t not to be defined. > > > > > > > > > > The problem is when HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined and therefore pid_t is > > > > > not known, pid_t should be defined to int. Or am I wrong? > > > > > > > > In fact thera are two problems. One you just mentioned. Second > > > > HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is _never_ defined without the patch above. > > > > In other words: configure didn't defined HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H (it didn't even > > > > check for it) although I have it in the standard location. > > > > > > sys/types.h is not anywhere in configure.ac but is checked internaly by > > > 'checking for ANSI C header files' (if you don't have ANSI C header files, > > > it does not check for sys/types.h) - check in config.log. > > > > No. Can't see checking for sys/types.h. May it be the problem that I'm > > using autoconf 2.50? > > Grrrrr, maybe you should read the README.cvs one more time (now section > beginning with: '!!! Important note !!!' ;-))) Well, I did. But I don't have autoconf 2.52 available... And I should have written it when sending the first mail... > (you had to change AC_PREREQ(2.52) to AC_PREREQ(2.50) to make it > buildable, hadn't you???) I did. > P.S. Now I think this problem is solved, so I'm going to release joe-2.9.7. Thanks for solving it and sorry for wasting your time. :/ pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |