On Wednesday 04 September 2002 17:11, Thomas Oldervoll wrote:
> Thanks to the Jode developers for a great decompiler. I had to make
> a small change to Jode to fullfill my goal of decompiling a jar
> file.There was one class that couldn't be decompiled, and Jode merely
> gave up on the rest of the file. To make Jode continue with the next
> class, I made some simple changes to jode.decompiler.Main:
Sorry for the very long delay. I have been busy with other things and
didn't work on jode lately.
I have added the patch now to the 1.1 CVS branch (so it will be
included in jode-1.1.2). I did it slightly different, as I don't want
to introduce new collection class issues. There's also a very
different new version which needs the patch too, but that can be done
> Updated source code for jode.decompiler.Main is attached. Is this
> the proper way of contributing?
The best way is to send in a diff, which shows only the differences
and can be applied automatically :) I think that wincvs can make
diff's. OTOH I could diff it myself.
Jochen Hoenicke, University of Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany
Email: hoenicke@... Tel: +49 441 798 3124
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.