#3 More Confusing Strong Renamer...

[Anonymous]

Instead of having them be one character long, make
them longer but look the same...

aaaa
Aaaa
aAaa
AAaa
etc

Maybe even better use characters that look very
similar like, O and 0(zero)...

OOOOO
O0OOO
OO0OO
O00OO
etc

It just makes more work for those trying to get a good
look at decompiled code.

[Nobody/Anonymous]

Logged In: NO

Or even better to use "I", "l" and "1"... :)

[Jochen Hoenicke]

Logged In: YES
user_id=18252

This is a nice idea. I may look at it later.

You may try to add this feature yourself. Add a class
jode.obfuscator.modules.ConfusingRenamer that implements
the Renamer interface.
Look at UniqueRenamer for a simple example, or
KeywordRenamer for a renamer that accepts options.

[Nobody/Anonymous]

Logged In: NO

I'm doing a variant of StrongRenamer with two new
parameters: minlength and firstcharset. So, one could do
this:

renamer = new CheesyRenamer { firstcharset = "Il",
minlength=7, charset="Il1" }

.. which would give names like
Il1l1I
l1Il1l
I11l1I
.. and none starting with 1 (one), since they would be
renamed to _fld_1111 by Jad.