Menu ▾ ▴

#3 NPE when running JNorm 0.0.7b

open
nobody
None
5
2009-07-22
2009-07-22
No

Hi,

we've been running JNorm 0.0.4b w/o Problems. However, after Update to 0.0.7b we keep getting a few NPEs during JNorms Execution. There is. however, a Result.

Here's the StackTrace of oneo f them:

[jnorm] jnorm task
[jnorm] java.lang.NullPointerException
[jnorm] at org.jnorm.rules.SubstringAfter.isValidIndexes(SubstringAfter.java:52)
[jnorm] at org.jnorm.rules.SubstringAfter.execute(SubstringAfter.java:37)
[jnorm] at org.jnorm.JNormVisitor$1.visitEnd(JNormVisitor.java:55)
[jnorm] at org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.accept(Unknown Source)
[jnorm] at org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.accept(Unknown Source)
[jnorm] at org.jnorm.JNorm.scan(JNorm.java:13)
[jnorm] at org.jnorm.task.JNormTask.execute(JNormTask.java:63)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:288)
[jnorm] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source)
[jnorm] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
[jnorm] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:357)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:385)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1337)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1306)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExecutor.java:41)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1189)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:758)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:217)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:257)
[jnorm] at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:104)

I already checked the Definition of the Ant-Task (maybe sthg- changed between 0.0.4b and 0.0.7b) but it looks good to me.

Would be cool if you had a hint! Cheers, _ralf_

Discussion


Log in to post a comment.