Re: [Jmol-developers] crystal structure unit cell axis

[Egon W. <eg...@sc...>]

On Saturday 26 January 2002 06:07, Bradley Smith wrote:
> > I will continue my current work on porting the 3D rendering stuff to CDK,
> > i.e. at least part of it, in order to get good insight on the current
> > ChemFrame stuff... which is rather hard to read, and a nice mix of both
>
> model
>
> > and viewer ...
>
> I would say a bad mix, not a nice mix. A mix of model and viewer is
> something to be avoided.

that "nice" was supposed to have some irony in it ;)

> > If I understand correctly, you want ChemFrame to contain to model,
>
> CFRenderer
>
> > the viewer, which makes use of the AtomRenderer and BondRenderer...
>
> I don't recommend using acronyms. Is a CFRenderer a ChemFrameRenderer or a
> ChemFileRenderer? See the problem.

Yes, did not intend to name the class that way.

> > Do the latter two draw one or many bonds, or in other words, are there
>
> many
>
> > AtomRenderers or just one?
>
> Only one renderer would be needed. See the design of miniJmol.
>
> > I would like to make a branch in the CVS at the day the 1.0 release was
>
> made,
>
> > but i am not sure that it possible... (just asked a CVS wizard...) The
>
> It is simple.
>
>   cvs checkout -r v1 Jmol
>   cvs tag -b b1

Ah, excellent.

> The first command gets the files which went into version 1. The second
> command creates a branch named b1 on those files. If you are not using a
> command-line cvs client, I imagine similar options are available from a
> GUI.
>
> > current CVS would then be the HEAD branch, in which we can work towords
> > a 2 release... Once a 1.1 release is completed (bug fixes have to be
>
> ported
>
> > to the new branch), the 1 branch will be taged v1_1...
> >
> >
> > This corresponds to what you propose, right?
>
> Yes.

I'll do this today...

Egon