From: <nve...@cl...> - 2006-03-27 06:20:44
|
De: Brian Salter-Duke <b=5Fduke=40octa4.net.au> >I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to >raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for >jmol.js and the jmol directory in web pages. I can the see the principle = i >here but it causes serious problems in two respects:- > >1. When trying to incorporate jmol in wiki pages. One user doing this >reports that ../extensions/jmol is needed for it to work in preview and >./extensions/jmol when the article is saved (I could have these the >wrong way round). An absolute address would fix this. I can not even get >it to work like that user reports. I'm still struggling. I will work again on Jmol extension for MediaWiki in April, after the Jmol= wiki is moved to MediaWiki. If you can wait until then, I will see what can be done to install easily = the Jmol extension. Otherwise, you can easily modify Jmol.js to remove the test on absolute ad= dresses. Miguel: would it be ok to add a function like jmolAuthorizeAbsoluteAddress= () in Jmol.js so that people can desactivate the test on absolute addresse= s ? Nico |