From: <nve...@cl...> - 2006-02-26 18:57:15
|
----Message d'origine---- De: Egon Willighagen <e.willighagen=40science.ru.nl> > >Today I received an update from SourceForge announcing that subversion su= pport = >has gone public. Since I like subversion a lot more than CVS (e.g. you ca= n = >move files=21), I would like to propose to move to SVN. > >There a lot of open things, like how we should port our CVS tree to SVN. = If = >everyone is OK with this, let's try to make this move somewere in march. = Since = >I have to do this for other SF projects too, I will report later on how = >things are suppose to work. From what I heard about SVN, it's a lot better than CVS (moving files, ato= mic commit, ...). My only concern is the SVN support in Eclipse: plugins do exist but I don'= t know how well they are integrated, and they require one more step in the= installation to be able to check out Jmol. Installing a development environment for Jmol with Eclipse is currently ve= ry straightforward (thanks to Bob's work on the developers' documentation)= =2E If anyone is interested to help working on Jmol, it's very easy. That = would be great to keep this as simple as possible. Does anyone know if SVN will be supported natively in Eclipse in the near = future ? I am pretty sure it will be done, but I don't know when. Otherwise, does anyone have experience with a SVN plugin for Eclipse ? Nico |