Thanks! That works perfectly!
Hi, Pim,On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:38 AM, pim schravendijk <email@example.com> wrote:
Now the printing part:
For frames that are counted as x.y, "load trajectory" seems to load
all the timesteps in 1.y, because it is just one file, did I get that
Yes, I think so.
Unfortunately for my case, it appears that the easiest image printing
solution via "write frames" only prints images of incrementing files
x and ignores the incrementing frames .y , is that correct?
It's probably not aware of trajectories. Should be model-by-model.
OK, I've uploaded the changes for 11.7.44 that take care of this. All you should need is
write frames "xxx.jpg"