Maybe the first question is "what needs to be fixed?"

Let's assume for the sake of discussion that there is a port of Jmol to iPads to address the need for image updating performance.  Let's also assume that Jmol has been factored into UI, scripting, parsing raw source, image calculation, and image rendering components (or libraries) that can be worked on separately.

What pieces of the existing Jmol code base would go into each of these iPad components?  How would they need to be changed to run on an iPad?

--Chuck

On Mar 30, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Robert Hanson wrote:

Absolutely.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Craig T Martin <cmartin@chem.umass.edu> wrote:
The challenge of open source is "who's going to fix this and how?" Perhaps our discussion should move in that direction?



--
Robert M. Hanson
Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
1520 St. Olaf Ave.
Northfield, MN 55057
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
phone: 507-786-3107


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users