From: Steve B. <Ste...@an...> - 2010-03-28 03:04:32
|
Hi Da feng, Thanks for your contribution. Can I ask you to please do a few things? 1. You say you are making 4 contributions (3 fixes and one new GC). Please submit each of the fixes as separate patches and submit the GC as one (or if appropriate, more) patch. 2. Please ensure that the code passes pre-commit before submitting. 3. Can you please tell us about this new GC? We very much welcome contributions of new GCs, but any new GC implies a significant maintenance burden over time, so it is very important that the new GC have a compelling reason for inclusion (is it much faster than existing ones? does it work in some special context that other ones cannot? is there something else particularly compelling about it?). Generally the best place for research contributions (such as a new GC) is the research tracker. Thanks again for taking the time to contribute your work. Cheers, --Steve On 27/03/2010, at 6:52 PM, Da Feng wrote: > 2977410 bug fixes and a new GC Open 2010-03-27 nobody > vondart None 5 > It is tested on amd x86_64 platform, so some pre-commit test seems > to fail. > > > DaFENG > Coder > Telecommunication && Network Industry > Pudong > Shanghai > China > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev_______________________________________________ > Jikesrvm-researchers mailing list > Jik...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-researchers |