No, cvs head should work with 0.06.
I haven't taken too close of a look yet but I don't think there were
any changes in 0.07 to the VM/classpath interface that we are going
to change Jikes RVM to exploit. They did do a split of java.lang.Thread
into Thread and VMThread, but we have our own implementation of Thread
so we cleanup our own code and try to use the classpath java.lang.Thread
this doesn't matter.
My guess is that we will continue to
work with both 0.06 and 0.07. I did switch all the regression testing
at watson to 0.07 and plan to change the classpath stamp to download 0.07.
But 0.06 should be ok for 2.3.1.
Chris Hoffmann <email@example.com> Sent by: firstname.lastname@example.org
12/02/2003 10:54 AM
Please respond to jikesrvm-core
Re: [Jikesrvm-core] planning for 2.3.1
David P Grove wrote:
> Kris Venstermans noticed a problem in the definition of register
> constants for PowerPC. I'm going to check in his fix in a few
> but will forward you his note so you can try it locally.
I applied his patch and so far things look good. I'll kick off the full
Oh, Does the latest CVS head *require* classpath 0.07?
Chris Hoffmann -- Dept. of Computer Science/UMass at Amherst
Jikesrvm-core mailing list