RE: [jgrapht-developers] 0.7.0

[John V. S. <js...@gm...>]

Thanks for the update!

Regarding experimental, we already have separate ant targets compile and
exp.compile.  If we can get compile warning-free, that would be a big
step forward.  After that we would impose the rule that any code moving
out of experimental would have to be warning-free.

I'll contact the author of .util.equivalence (in case he's not reading
this) to see if he has any more tests available.

JVS

On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 23:46 +0100, Hartmut Benz wrote:
> I just treated the .util.equivalence and some of the dependent classes
> package for generics. Down to 74 generics-type-cast warnings now:
> - alg (19 - some usage of equivalence classes untouched)
> - experimental (35)
> - graph (18 - almost entirely related to the edge factories)
> - traverse (1)
> - util.permutation (1)
> 
> The JUnit tests still work OK, but I think the equivalence package (and the
> other classes) need some regression testing (by people that actually use
> them in previously working code - the test cases are insufficient).
> 
> Hartmut
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> jgrapht-developers mailing list
> jgr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jgrapht-developers