RE: [jgrapht-developers] Jalopy update

[Barak N. <ba...@3p...>]

> I still think the explicit list of import is preferable.  To be
> argumentative, modern IDE's do indeed show where the class is coming =
from,
> but they also do clever folding :)... One can automatically unclutter =
the
> import list by letting the IDE fold it (I think it's even the default =
in
> Eclipse)...

Oh, while we're there, the IDE claim could also be used to justify
eliminating my 'm_' prefixing, because recent IDE's highlight member =
fields
differently to local variables.  I think the prefixing is no longer
justified.  Sorry John, I know you never liked the prefixing anyway.

Barak=20