Re: [jgrapht-developers] JGraphT backport

[John V. S. <js...@gm...>]

Barak Naveh wrote:
>>jgrapht-jdk1.4.jar (retrowoven version)
>>jgrapht-jdk1.5.jar (standard compile)
> 
> 
> Such a naming convention indeed eases upgrading.  However, there should be a
> way to easily identify the version of each jar (if separated from the
> distribution).  Perhaps each jar should include a 'version.txt' file at its
> top-level; the 'version.txt' could be generated automatically and include
> the respective JGraphT version info.

Good point.  Instead of a separate version.txt, I have changed the build 
to burn the build/version information into the jar manifest.  I used the 
standard "Specification-Version" attribute for the version number, and 
for "Implementation-Version", appended the jdk1.4/jdk1.5 suffix as well.

JVS