In second thought, the guy has a point. The AbstractBaseGraph is
non-instantiable. Perhaps should be called "AdjacencyListGraph" and made
instantiable (non-abstract)?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SourceForge.net [mailto:no...@so...]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 08:25
> To: no...@so...
> Subject: [jgrapht - Users] simple, multi, pseudo, directed
>=20
>=20
> Read and respond to this message at:
> https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3D2177962
> By: nobody
>=20
> In graph theory, I am well aware of the distinction between simple, =
multi,
> etc.
>=20
> However, when it comes to implementation, I am wondering why you chose =
to
> divide
> them up. Could you not come up with a single data structure to handle =
all
> the
> cases?
|
