#3 Patch for #1182659 (Remove dependence on mmmockobjects)

[Remko Popma]

apply this patch as follows:
1. navigate to directory "src/jester"
(the parent of the "test" directory)
2. execute "patch -p0 < patch_remove_mock.txt"

Changes:
* Removed MockMutationMaker.java
* Removed MockMutationsList.java
* Modified AllTests.java
* Modified ClassTestTesterTest.java
* Modified MutationsListTest.java
* Renamed MutationsListTest.java RealMutationsListTest.java
* Added MockInterceptor.java

[Remko Popma]

Patch for #1182659 (Remove dependence on mmmockobjects)

[Elliotte Rusty Harold]

Logged In: YES
user_id=226817

Is this patch merely inspired by SEASAR or does it actually
use code from SEASAR?

[Remko Popma]

Same as original patch, but fixes issues in MockInterceptor

[Remko Popma]

Logged In: YES
user_id=544920

MockInterceptor.java does not use any code of Seasar. The
original
org.seasar.framework.aop.interceptors.MockInterceptor is
implemented with AOP, where my version uses
java.lang.reflect.Proxy.

I don't think there are any license issues.
I do want to keep the right to use this class in other
projects though, both open source and closed source. Let me
know if that is a problem.

I found some issues in MockInterceptor with methods
returning primitives. These issues are fixed in the second
patch.
Installation is as before:
1. navigate to directory "src/jester"
(the parent of the "test" directory)
2. execute "patch -p0 < patch_remove_mock2.txt"

[Elliotte Rusty Harold]

Logged In: YES
user_id=226817

Cool. I'll apply this in the near future.

We don't have any formal process here for assigning
copyright, so the situation is that you grant a license to
whoever wants to use this code you've submitted under the
usual Jester license (MIT license). However, what you wrote
is still your property (unless you choose to sell or grant
it to somebody else); and therefore you are free to use it
in any way you feel. For instance, you can grant a different
license to somebody else, or incorporate it in a closed
source product.

Because the MIT license pretty much grants these rights to
everyone this is sort of an academic discussion. If the
license were more restrictive, e.g. GPL, then this would
have a lot more practical impact.