From: Colin L. <cl...@go...> - 2012-10-26 20:41:54
|
On 26 October 2012 21:23, Colin Law <cl...@go...> wrote: > On 26 October 2012 21:20, Alan Ezust <ala...@gm...> wrote: >> The "vendor" of openjdk reports "sun" for 1.6 and "oracle" for 1.7. >> That's just what it does. >> Maybe we should be reporting instead the java.vm.name instead of the >> java.vendor >> from the about jEdit dialog? >> I don't even know what "vendor" means with openjdk now. > > I thought I remembered a change that went through a year (maybe 2) or > so ago that showed the java version more intelligently. I am not > certain though. I will have to see if I can find some reference. I found a discussion here 14th March 2011 where Shlomy Reinstein added java.vm.name and java.runtime.name to the Activity Log. I thought that a change was also made to the About dialog. Perhaps it has got lost, or perhaps I am mistaken. Colin > > Colin > >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Colin Law <cl...@go...> wrote: >>> >>> I am using Ubuntu 12.04 and have installed jedit from the Ubuntu >>> repository. >>> Help > About jEdit says jEdit 5.0pre1 server mode, using Sun >>> Microsystems Inc Java 1.6.0_24 >>> However I have not installed Sun Java, only openjdk. >>> update-java-alternatives -l >>> shows only >>> java-1.6.0-openjdk-i386 1061 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-i386 >>> >>> Is the above expected behaviour? >>> >>> Colin >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> WINDOWS 8 is here. >>> Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. >>> Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. >>> http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ >>> join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ >>> -- >>> ----------------------------------------------- >>> jEdit Users' List >>> jEd...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-users >> >> |