From: Brian Knowles <BrianK@PSSG.com> - 2001-11-01 17:25:37
> From: Sergey V. Udaltsov > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:56 AM
> > This is not a good idea, because the file system browser is
> also used
> > in 'open' and 'save as' dialog boxes.
> OK. Look at it this way:
> There are two entities: File System Browser component and
> File System Browser dockable. The component should be in the
> core, no doubts. And it can be used in open/save dialogs etc.
> But the dockable can be a plugin (very small, I know). And
> session directory should be set as the current for dockable
> (so "FSB Dockable" plugin would depend on "Sessions"). Does
> this make sense?
Would a sessions based virtual file system implementation be a solution
here? I'm not intimately familiar with the VFS interface, but that seems to
be the best way to integrate plugins with the File System Browser.