Is 1.1 still planned? I haven't seen any commits for the last year in the sourceforge statistcs viewer.

Mark
Nick wrote:
Alex,

On Friday 05 October 2007 19:03, you wrote:
  
On 10/4/07, Nick <lonnc2000@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    
I was just wondering what the timescales for a 1.1 release might be - the
list
seems to have gone a little quite of late.
      
Yes, it's been really quiet.  There's no plans for a 1.1 right now.
Anything specific that you need?

    

I just noticed that one was in the planning at the start of the year,
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=330b6fd60702130213g782c2476pe4c90707ffb8a18f%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=jdbm-general

I'm interested in this bug being resolved,
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=856954&group_id=4155&atid=104155

With version 1.0 I'm currently getting a NPE being thrown (when starting with 
a corrupt transaction log):
java.lang.NullPointerException
        at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1820)
        at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1719)
        at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1305)
        at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:348)
        at jdbm.recman.TransactionManager.recover(TransactionManager.java:224)
        at jdbm.recman.TransactionManager.<init>(TransactionManager.java:105)
        at jdbm.recman.RecordFile.<init>(RecordFile.java:99)
        at jdbm.recman.BaseRecordManager.<init>(BaseRecordManager.java:140)
        at jdbm.recman.Provider.createRecordManager(Provider.java:89)
        at 
jdbm.RecordManagerFactory.createRecordManager(RecordManagerFactory.java:114)
        at 
com.amiwall.db.jdbm.HashtableFactory.<init>(HashtableFactory.java:15)

While I haven't ruled out my code for causing this yet, I haven't experienced 
any problems when the transaction log isn't corrupt....

And finally, there appears to have been some fairly significant code changes 
since 1.0 and I guess what I'm really after is some kind of signal from you 
guys as to how confident you are with the code currently at the HEAD of cvs.

Cheers,

Nick

P.S. On the summary sf page http://sourceforge.net/projects/jdbm/ the latest 
news says that the last release was 0.12 (2001-08-28), this probably needs to 
be updated.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Jdbm-general mailing list
Jdbm-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdbm-general