Re: [Jcrbrowser-developers] JCRBrowser License (WAS: Re: JCR browser Splashscreen)

[<san...@gm...>]

Perfect, to make easier and understandable for the End-User I would 
favour the Apache 2 license.

+1 for the Apache 2 license

Ketan, what do you think? Is it ok for you too?

Rishikesh Parkhe schrieb:
> 
> Gents,
> 
> So are we settled with Splash license ?
> You can take a call ... APL 2 / CC.
> I am okay with both.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rishi
> 
> 
> On 15/10/2007, * Sandro Böhme* <san...@gm... 
> <mailto:san...@gm...>> wrote:
> 
>     Hello again,
> 
>     I changed the Sourceforge categorizations to make clear that the JCR
>     Browser is Apache2 licensed. Thanks for the hint Ketan!
> 
>     Bye,
> 
>     Sandro
> 
>     Sandro Böhme schrieb:
>      > Hi Ketan,
>      >
>      > you are right at the sourceforge page there is no license associated.
>      > It has been resetted some time ago. In general the JCR Browser is
>     Apache
>      > 2 license. When you download it, you will find a LICENSE.txt file
>     at the
>      > top level of the folder and every source file that comes with the
>      > download bundle starts with the Apache2 license header. It even went
>      > through the Eclipse due dilligence intellectual property process
>     without
>      > problems as Eclipse Corona uses the JCR Browser too.
>      > Apache2 license has not a copyleft as the EPL has. This is why I
>     think
>      > it fits quite good. Is this ok for you?
>      >
>      > Best regards,
>      >
>      > Sandro
>      >
>      > Ketan Padegaonkar schrieb:
>      >> Hi Sandro,
>      >>
>      >> I've been wondering with this licensing issue for a while now.
>     For one,
>      >> JCRBrowser does not have a license associated with it.
>      >>
>      >> There is no way to determine if a contribution made by somebody like
>      >> Rishi is compatible or not :(
>      >>
>      >> I know that ThoughtWorks uses JCRBrowser, and distributes it to
>     the end
>      >> customers, there are issues with distribution because of the
>     licensing
>      >> involved. Can we decide on the license that JCRBrowser is
>     released under?
>      >>
>      >> I feel that EPL should be a good choice, since it acceptable with
>      >> BSD-like licenses.
>      >>
>      >> Does anybody have any opinions for or against this?
>      >>
>      >> Cheers,
>      >> Ketan Padegaonkar
>      >> I blog... therefore I am... http://ketan.padegaonkar.name/
>      >>
>      >> The only thing worse than X Windows: (X Windows) - X
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> Sandro Böhme wrote:
>      >>> Ok, as Sourceforge blocks zip files: The license the I would
>     like to
>      >>> attach to the release looks like this:
>      >>> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/in/legalcode
>      >>>
>      >>> Bye,
>      >>>
>      >>> Sandro
>      >>>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >
>      >
>      >
>     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>      > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
>      > Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
>      > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a
>     browser.
>      > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Jcrbrowser-developers mailing list
>      > Jcr...@li...
>     <mailto:Jcr...@li...>
>      > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jcrbrowser-developers
>      >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> keep rendering your thoughts
> http://freewebs.com/rishiparkhe