From: <jbo...@li...> - 2006-04-24 09:30:06
|
Author: mic...@jb... Date: 2006-04-24 05:29:52 -0400 (Mon, 24 Apr 2006) New Revision: 3939 Modified: labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/manual/en/Chapter-Rule_Language/Section-XML.xml Log: Modified: labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/manual/en/Chapter-Rule_Language/Section-XML.xml =================================================================== --- labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/manual/en/Chapter-Rule_Language/Section-XML.xml 2006-04-24 08:21:44 UTC (rev 3938) +++ labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/manual/en/Chapter-Rule_Language/Section-XML.xml 2006-04-24 09:29:52 UTC (rev 3939) @@ -207,9 +207,9 @@ <para>It is possible generally to migrate from drools 2 to drools 3 XML format, if you have existing rulebases you want to port to drools 3. - This may be done with a stylesheet, possibly. Note that Drools 2.x will - not be as trivial to port to drools 3 XML. You would be best to look at - the new DSL features in Drools 3 DRL.</para> + This may be done with a stylesheet, possibly. Note that Drools 2.x DSLs + will not be trivial to port to drools 3 XML. You would be best to look + at the new DSL features in Drools 3 DRL.</para> <para>Note that while "eval" allows you to more or less directly migrate your conditions from Drools 2.x to 3, it is far more powerful, and |