From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-07-15 17:41:16
|
I think a new jmx remote connector is what we really need, because even with the current workaround, there are still the problems of accessing objects that are not really designed for remote access. We need a flexible connector that can be configured for remote class loading and even custom serialization/object replacement of non-remotable objects. I would have looked at this first but I was not sure how far Tom has gotten with the current implementation. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3885074#3885074 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3885074 |