[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: NAT issues

[<ad...@jb...>]

Yes, I know.

My point was that the system property should be unnecessary in most cases. 
If we didn't resolve the network address on the server and 
instead just allowed something to be configured/transported that might only make 
sense to resolve on the client.

i.e. differentiate
bind address == nic that the service accepts requests on (could be 0.0.0.0)
connect address == host name used by client that could resolve to the firewall 
with port forwarding enabled or might resolve to different nics on different subnets even without a firewall.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883134#3883134

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883134