From: <rl...@jb...> - 2005-06-24 19:53:52
|
I worked with this yesterday and created a build-thirdparty.xml based off of what was in the thirdparty directory in the 4.0 branch. I found a couple of things that will need clarification. 1) hibernate thirdparty vs. hibernate module Currently when we try to pull down the thirdparty modules the build sees a directory "hibernate" (our integration module). Because this module exists it will not pull down the thirdparty component "hibernate". How should we resolve this? The way the build is currently structured a thirdparty component cannot have the same name as a source module. Should the hibernate thirdparty be moved to jboss/hibernate? 2) what we use vs. what is there If I go through every module under 4.0 (e.g. iiop, varia) looking at the build.xml file and look at what library classpaths are defined, and then creating a list of all library dependencies required, the list does not match the number of items in thirdparty. I assume some items in thirdparty (the early version of tomcat for example) are no longer used. Should I base the generated libraries.ent off of the cvs thirdparty dir as a whole, or just off of what is used. 3) naming conventions Currently in the repository we have some dual directories, one called juddi, one called juddi-juddi. Which should I base off of? 4) new thirdparty items In some cases, such as apache commons, the jars have been moved to their own repository locations. Won't this necessitate a change to the build.xml files ? Thanks! Ruel Loehr View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882653#3882653 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3882653 |