From: <dim...@jb...> - 2005-05-06 08:33:56
|
"sco...@jb..." wrote : | ... | Instead, I'm thinking that if the SARDeployer just accepted a dependency graph in terms of the service names, that could be used instead in a less intrusive fashion. I don't see any reason why this should not work, and it might have some benefit to users as well. | What the SARDeployer would do with this ObjectName dependency graph? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3876729#3876729 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3876729 |