[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Synchronous vs. asynchronous NACK when client refuses de

[<ovi...@jb...>]

Adrian's reply:

anonymous wrote : 
  | I think you are wrong Ovidiu.
  | I recently fixed this in JBossMQ to avoid the blocking:
  | http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=60912
  | 
  | The client should refuse the delivery with an asynchronous NACK.
  | You should not block server threads on communication or slow/unreliable clients.
  | 
  | OFF-TOPIC:
  | I believe this also fixes an issue with distributed deadlocks that were a scourge
  | of the basic JBossMQ IL design that required the introduction of a thread pool
  | to handoff requests in UIL2.
  | 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3876359#3876359

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3876359