From: <ale...@jb...> - 2005-04-29 12:20:35
|
"ad...@jb..." wrote : When I discussed this with Scott (on the pojoserver thread) | we decided we wanted to go down the road of allowing ANY inside the metadata. | | There is an xml test for this in the testsuite, but I don't see it getting tested? | http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jbosstest/src/resources/xml/pojoserver/test1-ejb-deployment.xml?rev=1.1&view=auto Right, I haven't looked at it yet. "ad...@jb..." wrote : What we are really looking for is the ability to provide some kind of registry or | self bootstrap of | schema public id -> SchemaBinding Yes, I know. There are just too many things to work on here. Before looking at "the ability to provide some kind of registry", I would like to have "good enough" binding working for at least one schema (this includes verious customizations). Once we have it, I think, some-kind-of-registry (or even runtime binding instead) should not be a big problem. However, if this is a priority right now, let me know. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3875899#3875899 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3875899 |